On Jun 6, 2009, at 7:37 PM, thomas malloy wrote:
Vortexians;
We have previously discussed the subject of hydrogen storage and
utilization.
Ammonia is an important method of energy storage in itself, and a
possible intermediate product of the silicon method of renewable
energy storage
And one would think that this motor is a gutless wonder.
Not so fast, but the motor is. Here are basic specs:
HP2g Specs:
- V8 Engine
- 400 HP (horsepower)
- 500 Ft. Lbs. Tq. (foot pounds of torque)
- 110 MPGe (miles per gallon energy equivalent)
- E-85 (ethanol fuel)
- Made in the USA
Horace Heffner wrote :
Unless I missed something, there is insufficient information on this
site to make any kind of determination of the economic viability of the
technology.
For your edification, here is a paper on fuel cells that I alluded to
previously,
Looking into this some more... It looks legit.
Only tidbit I've seen so far about the tech is that they are using very high
compression and
advanced electronics... And E85 ethanol as the fuel.
They just pulled out of the X-prize competition...
Here's the press release as to why:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:37 AM, thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote :
Unless I missed something, there is insufficient information on
this site to make any kind of determination of the economic
viability of the technology.
For your edification, here is a paper on fuel cells that I
On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Mark Iverson wrote:
And one would think that this motor is a gutless wonder.
Not so fast, but the motor is. Here are basic specs:
HP2g Specs:
- V8 Engine
- 400 HP (horsepower)
- 500 Ft. Lbs. Tq. (foot pounds of torque)
- 110 MPGe (miles per gallon energy
See:
http://research.missouri.edu/news/stories/090527_seminar.htm
Click where it says:
The web streamed videos can be found at the below links:
Video 1 - Robert V. Duncan, Ph.D.
Video 2 - Lawrence Forsley, Pamela Mosier-Boss, Ph.D., Frank E. Gordon,
Ph.D.
Video 3 - Edmund K. Storms, Ph.D.
. .
Not seminary! Although the skeptics do say we are a cult.
Not even a voice input error.
- Jed
Jeff Fink wrote (3rd June):
If you put me in a room where CO2 is double the ambient, I won't even
notice. If you put some potted plants in there with me they will love it
and grow like crazy. Vegetation on this planet is starved for more CO2.
Jeff
Here's a Climate Crock of the Week video
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:37 AM, thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote :
Unless I missed something, there is insufficient information on
this site to make any kind of determination of the economic
viability of the technology.
For your edification, here is a
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
Long term contributers of scientific discussion here are typically
tolerated more than newcomers,
I've noticed that it's not the length of time a person has been here.
Instead, what makes all the difference is their willingness to become part
of the
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic postings,
reveal his identity, and promise to eliminate all political commentary.
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
Vortexians;
I took some notes on Jack Sarfatti's paper on the Energy of the Vacuum.
So, hoping that it initiates a discussion: Does anybody understand what
a nonlocal pair entanglement operator is? What does Bell - basis
liaisons dangerous, mean?
As I recall, other physicists, Hal Puthoff
William Beaty wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic postings,
reveal his identity, and promise to eliminate all political commentary.
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
I say good riddence to the troll.
- Original Message -
From: William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009 10:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:grok is removed temporarily
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic
postings, reveal his identity, and
Hello vortexians,
Before I begin, I want to thank all of you. I have been lurking here for years.
I have seen the trolls come and go. They amuse for a while, then they get old.
But those of you who are of a true vortexian spirit always find new and
exciting food for the mind to try out. I
I'm more a lurker here too, but would you mind clarifying the geometry of
your question?
Anyway at a simplistic level I think the fields would tend to become
disconnected, they could be thrown off as radiation as fields disconnect
from the near field.
But if you are talking about a geometry such
I should have stood up for Grok, because his comments
(at least the ones I read) were accurate, but I was
busy at the time. Grok, I'm sorry I let you down.
Folks, see my website for evidence that supports
Grok's political/economic analysis:
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/
I think he (and
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
I am not sure why he should apologize for his off-topic postings,
Political posting sent here, rather than to vtxB.
If you expect him to reveal his true identity then that should be
written in the rules.
Nope. If
19 matches
Mail list logo
