[Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote on 2-14-10: ``Jones, On the surface (no pun intended) this is an absolutely absurd hypothesis [the expanding earth] ...and yet, I love it!'' Jack Smith writes on 2-15-10: Expansion of the Earth can be explained by the continuous creation of matter as proposed by Hoyle and Narlikar, and as demonstrated by Halton Arp in his exaination of quasars. Arp thinks that newly formed protons are red shifted but become blue-shifted as they age (and gain mass). I find this theory far less absurd than the Big Bang. Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: ``But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earth was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those Smokers! Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis!.'' Hi All, Earth is bombarded every day with thousands of tons of ice from space and, despite the dissociation of water molecules and the loss of hydrogen, is gradualy becoming a water world. Jack Smith
Re: [Vo]:Muon-catalyzed Ignition
I do not think Duncan takes the Muon-catalyzed Ignition hypothesis seriously. I think he listed it as one source of cold fusion that was originally considered, for completeness. He also mentioned Paneth and Peters (1926), who retracted. - Jed
[Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update
Feb. 14 update Naudin finds the current through the toroïdal stator coils does not change when a load is applied: http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm (towards the bottom of the page) Harry __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
[Vo]:About the water!
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: ``But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earth was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those Smokers! Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis!.'' Hi All, Earth is bombarded every day with thousands of tons of ice from space and, despite the dissociation of water molecules and the loss of hydrogen, is gradualy becoming a water world. Jack Smith All marine Fossils older than 200,000,000 are from seas that used to Cover the Continents. A better Question is why we a are still not covered with water if their had been enough water to not only cover the Seas, but to also cover a large portion of most continents. No doubt much erosion has happened which is the only way any of the continents was above water back then---the continents were higher. Also, when the continents first started moving apart, Recurvature hadn't kicked in as much as it did much later, so for a time the continents retained the smaller radius of the Earth, which elevated their centers far above sea level. Then, as the continents flattened out, the wrinkles became mountain ranges. Besides, as you noted, a lot of water has shown up since then. There has been far more vulcanism in the last 200,000,000 years than prior---This has released far more water than that which has fallen from Space. Plus, all of the Rydberg Matter Geo-Conjecture favours the formation of vast amounts of water. ---I really hope the Earth Growth isn't steam-inflation or Yellowstone might be the tip of an awful big steam-berg! --We really should be hedging our bets with those Little-Pops! Also, no one is saying that all the Continents Separated at exactly the same time. Scott Jack Smith writes on 2-15-10: Expansion of the Earth can be explained by the continuous creation of matter as proposed by Hoyle and Narlikar, and as demonstrated by Halton Arp in his exaination of quasars. Arp thinks that newly formed protons are red shifted but become blue-shifted as they age (and gain mass). I find this theory far less absurd than the Big Bang. _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
[Vo]:Bismuth as a nuclear catalytic LENR agent
Bismuth-209 appears to be an excellent CF nuclear catalysis agent when used with deuterium. It has 100% abundance. The nuclear catalysis reaction is: 209Bi83 + 2 D* -- 213At85 -- 209Bi83 + 4He2 + 23.847 MeV [-8.560 MeV] (125 ns) The major potential drawbacks are the presence of energetically feasible fission reaction channels not deflated electron confined: 209Bi83 + D* -- 198Pt78 + 13C6 + 21.660 MeV [5.599 MeV] 209Bi83 + 2 D* -- 198Pt78 + 15N7 + 37.819 MeV [5.412 MeV] bismuth has a typically low melting point, even in many alloys, and bismuth does not sustain a viable CF lattice by itself, i.e. must be imbedded in a useful lattice. It has a lattice constant of 4.75 angstroms, as opposed to Pd at 3.89 Å, and iron at 2.87 Å. Interesting coincidence that the average of iron and bismuth lattice constants is within about 2% of that of Pd. A bismuth-iron alloy might provide a feasible CF lattice at high loading temperatures. Bismuth has a spin of 9/2, a large value of mu = 4.5444 mu_N, and gyromagnetic ratio of 43.75 x 10^6 rad s^-1 T^-1. It has a nuclear magnetic resonance frequency of 6.963 MHz in a 1 T field. Nuclear catalysis is carried out best in as large a magnetic field as possible, using as large a B field gradient as possible. Other considerations are documented here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CFnuclearReactions.pdf http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/dfRpt Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:If U239 Plutonium, Does Bismuth + Neutrons to Polonium (Yikes!!!)
Hey folks! Let' rethink this one!!! I'm not a nuclear physicist, but I have long-wondered: If U238 Plutonium, then mightn't Bismuth tend to go to Polonium---which is really nasty stuff and highly radioactive---many thousands of times more radioactive than Plutonium. You guys are talking about a lot of neutrons being taken up into these reactions. It might not be that hard to reach approach a critical mass and create quite a lab-accident and a huge really-bad mess. (Not to mention, it could ruin your whole dayif you even still had a tomorrow!) Scott Bismuth-209 appears to be an excellent CF nuclear catalysis agent when used with deuterium. It has 100% abundance. The nuclear catalysis reaction is: Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ _ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
[Vo]:Need to find Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point.
Fran, is 'Skeletal Pd? ---Raney-Like??? To Group, I need to find two metals to make a Raney-Type porous metal sponge. Usually this is done with Ni Al, but they have very high melting points as do all members of the Ni-Pd group. With Al Ni the aluminum is leached out using 5-molar Sodium Hydroxide. Can anyone think of a way to do this with with metals with a much lower melting point--but one of which leaches away much more easily and is not difficult to handle. Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:34:44 -0500 From: francis.x.roa...@lmco.com Subject: [Vo]:Cold-Fusion ZPE Vibration of Naked Protons Relativistic Casimir Cavities To: scott...@hotmail.com CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com Wm. Scott Smith said on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:48:00 -0800 · Hey Fran, maybe we should try Raney Palladium for this application--what do you · think? I did Google skeletal Pd and it does exist in different forms, Since the Pd lattice is one of the best membranes for disassociating H2 it would make an interesting skeletal catalyst –combining the best properties of strong catalytic action with a ready source of monatomic hydrogen to take advantage of it. I corresponded with several people last year about the need to get monatomic hydrogen into intimate contact with the cavity, we discussed using thin Pd foils in stacks separated by nanopowders to provide the cavities- the intimate contact is the difficulty as nature will reform the h2 almost instantly – One interesting concept we turned up was melting the material and “wicking” it into the space between the foils but combining the membrane and the cavities into one alloy foil sounds better. I still would want to stack the foils so you force the fractional states to do full transitions between each layer. · That is the other possibility that this is another manefestation of · Relativistic Cavities--they are accelerating the fusions that happen all the · time anyway!!! Yes, I have made this same suggestion. Regards Fran _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
[Vo]:Need to find Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point.
Scott, I believe Rayney is a brand name, skeletal is the generic name for sponge like formations in a catalyst. They avoid the Casimir attraction that opposes a one step construction of a skeletal catalyst by first forming an alloy between a hard and soft metal and then leaching out the softer metal in a second step. Plain atmosphere diffusing inside these leached out cavities can ignite in the more energetic (smaller pore) skeletal catalysts. - pyrophoric- Regards Fran
Re: [Vo]:More-energetic Blue-shifted safer processed Raney
On 02/13/2010 11:19 PM, Francis X Roarty wrote: Scott, The EM drive link is http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/09/is-the-impossible-emdrive-possible/ *[snip] Actually, the untreated powdered alloy is pyrophoric, but once it has been * *treated with sodium hydroxide, I believe it is much safer. It can be bought in * *this form.[/snip]* * * From wiki: Raney nickel is produced when a block of nickel-aluminium alloy is treated with concentrated sodium hydroxide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_hydroxide. This treatment, called activation, dissolves most of the aluminium out of the alloy. The porous structure left behind has a large surface area, which gives high catalytic activity. The ratio of nickel to aluminium is around 1 for the original material used by Raney, and may vary from about 1 to 4. Please forward any links Regarding the sale of” unactivated” Rayney Nickel . I did look into this previously intending to use Drano to activate but maybe I got bad information. I haven't been following this, but this sure sounds wrong. Drano is a mixture of sodium hydroxide, sodium nitrate, and aluminum fragments, if I recall correctly. That's why it reacts so vigorously when you just add water. It's not even close to being pure sodium hydroxide. (Don't believe Wiki Answers on this one, they're wrong.) Pick up a package of lye at any painting supply store, it'll be a lot closer to what you want -- and it'll probably be safer to handle, as well. I don’t follow your logic in this [snip] These so-called Virtual Photons do not last long enough to hit a wall and leave the cavity. The only photons coming out of the cavity formed just inside the event horizon. [/snip] Where did the event horizon come from? Do your virtual photons remain spatial or can I apply my relativisticl interpertation? I am presently reviewing similar dialogue with Thomas Prevenslik under Sci Blog replies http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-hydrino-patent-based-catalyst-denied-while-later-patent-relativistic-hydrogen-based-casimir-cavity-granted.html or see snips below Regards Fran From Blog : Fran and I do not agree on the Casimir effect. Specifically, I do not believe the zero point field (ZPF) exists as Casimir claimed in 1949. We know the zero point energy (ZPE) for atoms and molecules exists. But there is absolutely no evidence for the ZPF. Today, astronomers infer the existence of the ZPF (or dark energy) based on an expanding Universe. But this is fallacious because the redshift that Hubble measured was most like due to absorption of the galaxy photon in submicron cosmic dust and not due to the Doppler effect. See www.nanoqed.org http://www.nanoqed.org at 2009 under Cosmology and Cosmic Dust, paper Dark Enegy and Cosmic Dust So that brings us to what is being measured in the Casimir experiments today. Fran says I have argued that thermodynamics in combination with electrostatic charging is the source of the Casimir effect. That was my first attempt to explain the Casimir effect without the ZPF. Since then, I have made the argument that the Casimir effect is caused by the thermal blackbody radiation emitted in the FIR by atoms in the surface of Casimir's plates. Electrostatic charging is not invoked. By this theory, wavelengths L 2G are excluded from the gap G as Casimir asumed. But unlike Casimnr and his followers, I do not throw away the excluded EM energy from the gap. Instead, I conserve the excluded EM energy by creating UV and higher energy photons having wavelength L = 2G in the gap. In effect, the gap acts as a FIR frequency up-conversion device as required by the conservation of energy. Unfortunately, Casimir did not conserve EM energy and this has been going on by his followers for over a half century. The EM energy U in the gap depends on the kT energy of the surface atoms and is constant as the gap G changes. For N surface and subsurface atoms, U ~ NkT, and therefore there is no Casimir force F in the conventional sense, i.e., F = dU/dG = 0. However the EM energy density U/G^3 is not constant. It is the gradient of EM energy density at the surfaces in combination with the polarizability of the surface atoms that produces equal and opposite force on the gap surfaces. See Ibid, Casimir Effect, paper Casimir Update. Unlike Casimir followers, I only believe in what is known to exist - blackbody thermal radiation. I leave the ZPF to the philosophers. Thomas Prevenslik My Reply either model works Thomas, nice to hear from you, I have no problem with your interpretation, the end result is the same as long as long as the virtual photons are inexhaustable. You mention /I do not throw away the excluded EM energy from the gap. Instead, I conserve the excluded EM energy by creating UV and higher energy photons
Re: [Vo]:If U239 Plutonium, Does Bismuth + Neutrons to Polonium (Yikes!!!)
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering about RC just the other day and wondered how his vortex/microwave work has progressed. I have sent a copy of this to his last known email address hoping that he might stick his welcomed nose in to update us and maybe share a story from the Dimebox(?) Salloon. :-( fromMail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@googlemail.com to hohlr...@gmail.com dateMon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM subject Delivery Status Notification (Failure) hide details 3:37 PM (11 minutes ago) Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: walha...@cvtv.net (R.C. McCaulay last know address, -Terry) Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 walha...@cvtv.net... User unknown (state 14).
[Vo]:Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point sintering
Sintered materials tend to have much larger gaps than their constituent particles. I am trying to make cavities, most of which are less 20 nm and many less than 10nm and some all the way down to the size of a single atom removed. Plus I want a relatively thick cavity wall--as much as is practical. For LPD, I only need to do this on the surface of one side. For the Relativistic-Cavity thing, we should probably find or make a suitable alloy, freeze it with liquid Nitrogen, crush and grind it into a fine powder then treat it with the leaching agent so there will be a large number of cavities available to soak up the Kr 81 gas.--unless someone has a better way to make nano-particles out of an alloyed metal. (I am actually leary about using Kr 85, just in case this process catalyzes nuclear reactions better than we are expecting.) Scott From: jone...@pacbell.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Need to find Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point. Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:55:21 -0800 To Group, I need to find two metals to make a Raney-Type porous metal sponge. Usually this is done with Ni Al, but they have very high melting points as do all members of the Ni-Pd group. Why not start with nano-powder – compress it mildly and heat to the level of diffusion bonding, and thereby forget about leaching? When Raney nickel was invented, nanoparticles were unknown as a starting point. Thus the need to leach. There are number of sources for nanoparticles, or you can buy the “black” (micron range) and grind it down by hand. http://www.americanelements.co.uk/pdnp.html I am told by a current practitioner (of Arata/Kitamura type experiments), that mortar-and-pestle hand grinding gives better results in the low nano size range (near 2 nm) – and at far less cost (use a fume hood as anything “nano” can be toxic, like asbestos). Jones _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
[Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes
I kid you not. See: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/ I once predicted CF-powered mechanical bats for this purpose, but this is more elegant. I wonder what the range is. QUOTES: . . . After hundreds of mosquitoes (which were kept in the hotel bathroom until showtime) were released into a glass tank, a laser tracked their movements and slowly shot them down, leaving their carcasses scattered on the bottom of the tank. While the demonstration was slowed down for public viewing, Mr. Myhrvold said that normally the lasers could shoot down anywhere between 50 to 100 mosquitoes per second. Mr. Myhrvold played a slow-motion recorded video that showed what happened to a representative mosquito. As the insect flew, a sudden light beam struck it, disintegrating parts of its body into a plume of smoke. It fell, even as its wings continued to beat. . . . The breakthrough relied on understanding how the technology that guides the precision of laser printing could be combined with the image-detecting charge-coupled devices, or C.C.D.’s, used in digital cameras and powerful image processing software. Mr. Myhrvold said he thinks there is particular potential in the Blu-ray laser technology, because blue lasers are more powerful than red ones and there are a lot of them being made cheaply now. He estimates that the devices could potentially cost as little $50, depending on the volume of demand. . . . The laser detection is so precise that it can specify the species, and even the gender, of the mosquito being targeted. “The women are bigger. They beat at a lower frequencies,” Mr. Myhrvold said. Since it is only the female mosquitoes who bite humans, for the sake of efficiency, his system would leave the males alone. - Jed
RE: [Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes
Jed sez: I kid you not. See: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/ ... Thanks Jed! It's nice to see that SDI has found a new purpose, a new enemy. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes
The inventer is missing the real use of the device. He's invented the Pap Blaster! Its a device from a novel by Spider Robinson that tracks camera lenses, and zaps them with light lasers, preventing them from taking coherent pictures. It was sold to celebrities to foil paparazi (hence the name) and made a main character rich. He then used the same technology to track eyeballs as they moved through cicadians motions, putting in images, thus creating a sort of hologram individualized to each person. On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:55 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Jed sez: I kid you not. See: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/ ... Thanks Jed! It's nice to see that SDI has found a new purpose, a new enemy. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
[Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?
Naudin's Solid State Generator. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjDbIrKIVXs How do you explain this? Harry __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update
At 11:33 AM 2/15/2010, Harry Veeder wrote: Feb. 14 update Naudin finds the current through the toroïdal stator coils does not change when a load is applied: http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm (towards the bottom of the page) Harry Very nice page. Naudin provides a lot of great detail. However, what might be the most important detail is missing. Let's suppose he's correct, that the current doesn't change under load. (If it changes, it doesn't change much; the problem is that only a little power escaping into the rotor might be enough.) He is showing about 0.4 amp through the coil, but that's a meter, showing average current, I'd think. AC. Could be tricky. Average power, roughly 5 watts. (It's 12 volts, apparently). Now, the load is a pickup coil with high-current LEDs connected to it. What do they do? They blink! At much lower frequency than the rotation speed, apparently. What's happening? My guess is that the rotational speed is oscillating so that the LED forward voltage is alternately blocking current and passing it. Passing current, there is a load, the rotor slows down, and blocking it, the rotor speeds up. How much power is being drawn off? The LEDs will only show light when the voltage is above the forward drop, so those LEDs, even when they appear to be on, are actually only showing flashing (4 times per rotation? For how long?) Or is the circuit there more complex, did I miss something? Here is the problem. Steorn claims that input power and output power are not actually related. That increasing input power will not increase output power. That may well be true. The input power switches the magnetic attractiveness of the ferrite cores for the permanent magnets on the rotor. It takes a certain amount of power to do that. This switching allows work to be done on the rotor by the permanent magnets, but how much work? Nothing that Naudin has shown so far indicates that there is an energy gain, at all. It would only take a very small fraction of the coil power to be diverted from generating heat to applying some torque to the rotor and thus doing work on it to accumulate energy. It looks to me like only a very small amount of power is being drawn off by the pickup coil and dumped through the LEDs, compared to the power being dissipated in the toriod circuit. The current in the LEDs may be perhaps 40 mA, peak, I can't tell. Suppose that's peak current. There is only that much current for a fraction of the duty cycle. And the voltage across the LEDs may be about 0.5 volt. 5 watts in, what, maybe 10 milliwatts average out? More? Less? That the input current does not seem to vary with the load tells us practically nothing except that this is not an ordinary motor. It could be one that, from the configuration, transfers a small and fixed amount of power to the rotor energy. So under load the rotor slows down, when the load is removed, it speeds back up, but the input current does not vary. So? It takes X power to switch the coil on and off. That does not vary with rotational velocity, it is, so to speak, a fixed cost. Spending that fixed cost allows the core to be used to power a permanent magnet motor, but it would appear that there is only so much power that could be developed from this attraction. Build the thing differently, with bigger cores and bigger toroids, you could develop more power. But still, it would appear, not much power. Steorn is claiming twice as much power in the load as in the toroid circuit. That seems preposterous from the Naudin work. It seems preposterous from everything Steorn has shown (i.e., why are very-low-friction magnetic bearings needed?) So far, no measurement of actual heat dissipation in the toroid circuit, such hand-waving about no back EMF. If there were really accurate calorimetry of the toroid circuit, and then accurate measurement of load power as well, we'd see if there was any extra energy. Steorn is promising calorimetry data by the end of February, as I recall. From Naudin, much better data than from Steorn, but the critical data (power in the toroid circuit and power in the load circuit) is missing still. All he has shown is that there is some power in the load circuit, but not how much, and that toroid circuit current does not appear to vary with load. But how much is that load? Looks like it's tiny to me! -- compared to toroid power.
RE: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?
I don't see the problem? Since when is it supprising if alternating current or pulsed dc from one coil induces a current in another coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:45:43 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? Naudin's Solid State Generator. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjDbIrKIVXs How do you explain this? Harry __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?
I have been told the toroidal geometry of the coil means its magnetic field is completely contained inside the coil, so how can it influence another coil? Harry From: Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 12:37:00 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? I don't see the problem? Since when is it supprising if alternating current or pulsed dc from one coil induces a current in another coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:45:43 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? Naudin's Solid State Generator. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjDbIrKIVXs How do you explain this? Harry __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
[Vo]:Torroidal Coil?
A Torroidal Coil? Do you mean the coil is like a wire that has been folded in half and then wrapped into a coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:59:11 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com I have been told the toroidal geometry of the coil means its magnetic field is completely contained inside the coil, so how can it influence another coil? Harry From: Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 12:37:00 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? I don't see the problem? Since when is it supprising if alternating current or pulsed dc from one coil induces a current in another coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:45:43 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? Naudin's Solid State Generator. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjDbIrKIVXs How do you explain this? Harry __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. Get the name you've always wanted ! @ymail.com or @rocketmail.com. _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Here is the problem. Steorn claims that input power and output power are not actually related. That increasing input power will not increase output power. Is that what they meant by not related? I think they meant if the operation of the coil can be engineered to consume less power you will get the same power out for a given switching frequency. That may well be true. The input power switches the magnetic attractiveness of the ferrite cores for the permanent magnets on the rotor. It takes a certain amount of power to do that. This switching allows work to be done on the rotor by the permanent magnets, but how much work? Harry __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
Re: [Vo]:Torroidal Coil?
Wm. Scott Smith wrote: A Torroidal Coil? Do you mean the coil is like a wire that has been folded in half and then wrapped into a coil? Scott here is a good illustration: http://web.ncf.ca/ch865/englishdescr/ToroidalCoil.html Harry __ Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/
