Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
> 
> ``But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before
> Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earth
> was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those "Smokers"!
> 
> Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis!.''
> 
> > Hi All,
> 
> Earth is bombarded every day with thousands of tons of
> ice from space and, despite the dissociation of water
> molecules and the loss of hydrogen, is gradualy becoming
> a water world.
> 
> Jack Smith


All marine Fossils older than 200,000,000 are from seas that used to Cover the 
Continents.  A better Question is why we a are still not covered with water if 
their had been enough water to not only cover the Seas, but to also cover a 
large portion of most continents.  

 

No doubt much erosion has happened which is the only way any of the continents 
was above water  back then---the continents were higher.  Also, when the 
continents first started moving apart, Recurvature hadn't kicked in as much as 
it did much later, so for a time the continents retained the smaller radius of 
the Earth, which elevated their centers far above sea level.  

 

Then, as the continents flattened out, the wrinkles became mountain ranges.  
Besides, as you noted, a lot of water has shown up since then.  There has been 
far more vulcanism in the last 200,000,000 years than prior---This has released 
far more water than that which has fallen from Space.  Plus, all of the Rydberg 
Matter Geo-Conjecture favours the formation of vast amounts of water.  ---I 
really hope the Earth Growth isn't steam-inflation or Yellowstone might be the 
tip of an awful big steam-berg!  --We really should be hedging our bets with 
those Little-Pops!

 

Also, no one is saying that all the Continents Separated at exactly the same 
time.

 

Scott


> Jack Smith writes on 2-15-10:
> 
> Expansion of the Earth can be explained by the continuous
> creation of matter as proposed by Hoyle and Narlikar, and
> as demonstrated by Halton Arp in his exaination of quasars.
> Arp thinks that newly formed protons are red shifted but
> become blue-shifted as they age (and gain mass). I find
> this theory far less absurd than the Big Bang.

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/

Reply via email to