Eric, take a look at this:
http://www.google.ca/trends/explore#q=lenr%2C%20andrea%20rossi%2C%20e-catcmpt=q
If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make historical
highs, I think that's a good time to short.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
If we decide Exactly how is that supposed to play out in your mind?
And note that you overlook (so far) entirely the mechanics how-to's of
shorting oil, Exxon, Solar, or anything else. It has been posted before,
on your own thread... that you have abandoned.
Ok sure, not really we, but rather vortex. There's a group of folks of
vortex that I feel are fairly credible / not gullible. They reacted very
smartly to defkalion, so I'll be looking to their reaction to this report
carefully.
They have a track record of being correct which is what bayesian
You've been trying to milk Vortex members since you first arrived.
Otherwise, you would have explained how to short long ago. Not only did
you shy away from your original 10:1 odds that I jumped at, but you haven't
done anything to further vortician interests since you've been aboard.
Otherwise,
This is an appeal to my readers- can you help me in analyzing
and predicting what will happen to/in/with our Field. Just now, hope
comes only from outside classic CF.
This time I hope to have many answers from you, I dare to think that you
still CARE.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like I'll need to revise my estimate downwards, YET AGAIN, that
Blaze will pull it out. Down to 7.88%.
Nuh-uh. It is 7.64%. You forgot to take into account the Coriolis effect on
this year's election cycle.
- Jed
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like I'll need to revise my estimate downwards, YET AGAIN, that
Blaze will pull it out. Down to 7.88%.
Nuh-uh. It is 7.64%. You forgot to take into account the
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Nuh-uh. It is 7.64%. You forgot to take into account the Coriolis effect
on
this year's election cycle.
I think you rounded up when you should have rounded down. I get 7.63%.
;-)
You must be in Australia.
- Jed
Are you here to make a buck on fellow vorticians?
Yes, but I'd like to think everyone here can share in the wealth if they
were paying attention. Certainly they deserve it.
Some people though, I guesss, for whatever bizarre reasons I'll never
understand - profoundly believe they don't deserve
The test in question, lighting an array of LEDs is trivial and *proves* nothing
significant because the power required is trivial. It is a partial answer to
critics who want to see continuous power output and not *apparently* fantastic
claims based on pulse phenomena. The peak power in an
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make historical
highs, I think that's a good time to short.
I'm less confident on getting the timing right for a breakout development
than you. Even if
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people though, I guesss, for whatever bizarre reasons I'll never
understand - profoundly believe they don't deserve it.
Goodness gracious! Who do you have in mind? Tell them to send me their
share of the moola.
When they gave Martin
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm less confident on getting the timing right for a breakout development
than you. Even if we saw a spike of interest comparable to the one shown
for the first Elforsk test, I very much doubt there will be more publicity
following upon it than
You are so right Jed. (not that it means anything from me)
But remember the chain:
Rossi - Tom Darden (Cherokee/IH) - Bill McDonough (
Cherokee/McDonough Challenge)
-Larry Page, Richard Branson, Elon Musk, Jimmy Wales etc
see:
Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com wrote:
But remember the chain:
Rossi - Tom Darden (Cherokee/IH) - Bill McDonough ( Cherokee/McDonough
Challenge)
-Larry Page, Richard Branson, Elon Musk, Jimmy Wales etc
Yup. That is who I had in mind. So far there is nothing in the mass media.
I
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make historical
highs, I think that's a good time to short.
I'm less
Here's a possible portfolio so far:
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 60%
XOM Put Options (2 years): 20%
CPST: 10%
CYPW: 10%
Entry will occur on a combination of google trends and when these equities
make coordinated movements that aren't influenced by other factors such as
general market conditions.
I apologize for responding so tardily. But I have been in transit and
outfitting for my summer/fall in Alaska.
Jones--
The dimensions of the emitter associated with spin transitions in a nucleus or
during nuclear magnetic momentum transitions does not have anything to do with
the size
Are you here to make a buck on fellow vorticians?
Yes
***Then my criticism of you is justified.
I want their money, not a mass media circus they might trigger.
***Jed, I like to think you are probably one of the few that will
financially benefit from such a mass media circus.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
Interesting portfolio. There's a couple of hitches in yer giddyup.
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 60%
XOM Put Options (2 years): 20%
***I dunno how to do put options, and if the breakout comes in 2 years + 1
day, you lost everything without the benefit of what you were actually
betting on.
CPST:
I'm going to remove CPST from the portfolio. They are in bed with the oil
gas industry. I think they will piss off their customers if they jump on
CF.
FSLR Put Options (2 years): 50%
XOM Put Options (2 years): 20%
CYPW: 20%
I agree we need to find more companies that make thermocouples and
CPST: 10%
***Reasonably healthy penny stock that should be reasonably healthy in 2
years + 1 day.
CPST is listed on the nasdaq with a 496.52M market cap. They are not a
penny stock.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting portfolio. There's a
You're right, even better. They're trading at about $1.50/share.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
CPST: 10%
***Reasonably healthy penny stock that should be reasonably healthy in 2
years + 1 day.
CPST is listed on the nasdaq with a
I don't think CPST will be pissing off their customers by jumping on CF
when it breaks out. It will be their customers who will be pissing off the
oil gas industry.
When hard drive manufacturers started selling to PC vendors, they didn't
stop selling to minicomputer vendors. They just stopped
Peter:
I do not understand what you are asking. What is a much regretted
friend? If it's predictions you're after, look at these 2 threads:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg93935.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg93531.html
How does hope... only
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
CYPW: 10%
***Unhealthy penny stock due to development money starvation. In the past
it has seen a 100x spike based upon conventional news. Dr. Yeong Kim
consults with them. If this black swan event does not happen
Interesting point. I was not aware of that aspect of their development.
Are they trying to be so oil-independent that they refuse to use it as a
lubricant? That would be stupid.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Kevin
In vacuum dynamics, it is important to get the chain of causation correct.
The key in all this is to produce a huge magnetic field.
In order to get a huge magnetic field, charge must be removed from the
electrons that produce the spin that in turn will produce this magnetic
field.
29 matches
Mail list logo
