You've been trying to milk Vortex members since you first arrived. Otherwise, you would have explained how to short long ago. Not only did you shy away from your original 10:1 odds that I jumped at, but you haven't done anything to further vortician interests since you've been aboard.
Otherwise, you'd have gone to your original thread and answered every contention put towards you. You won't do that on that thread, you won't do it on this thread, you won't do it here nor there. You won't do it anywhere, BlazeIam. On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok sure, not really we, but rather "vortex". There's a group of folks of > vortex that I feel are fairly credible / not gullible. They reacted very > smartly to defkalion, so I'll be looking to their reaction to this report > carefully. > > They have a track record of being correct which is what bayesian analysis > relies on. > > I've shorted stocks in my time. I'm pretty familiar with the strategy & > mechanics of buying put options, for example. > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> "If we decide"???? Exactly how is that supposed to play out in your >> mind? >> >> And note that you overlook (so far) entirely the mechanics & how-to's of >> shorting oil, Exxon, Solar, or anything else. It has been posted before, >> on your own thread... that you have abandoned. >> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg93568.html >> >> >> >> Are you here to obfuscate? Are you here to make a buck on fellow >> vorticians? Why did you abandon the previous thread on Vortex that covered >> most of the same ground? Why did you offer 10:1 odds when you first >> arrived and now you're at 2:1 odds which is about the same as any ordinary >> technical project? What are you trying to establish? >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Eric, take a look at this: >>> >>> >>> http://www.google.ca/trends/explore#q=lenr%2C%20andrea%20rossi%2C%20e-cat&cmpt=q >>> >>> If we decide the report is fully credible and those graphs make >>> historical highs, I think that's a good time to short. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Start shorting any of the alt energy plays. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The challenge with short selling is when to start? Immediately? A few >>>> weeks or months after news of cold fusion is starting to spread? (Note >>>> that rumors already appear to be circulating, e.g., in connection with the >>>> X Prize.) A year or two after? If one starts a short sale too early, it >>>> will be the cause of much sadness. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
