[Vo]:Questions Raised by Parkhomov Experiment Failure

2015-03-01 Thread Jack Cole
The failure of Parkhomov's experiment raises a few questions that hopefully he can answer with future experiments. There was some potentially bad news from Greenyer's visit including that his original supply of nickel has been exhausted except for 1 gram.

RE: [Vo]:Questions Raised by Parkhomov Experiment Failure

2015-03-01 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Higgins From the pictures I saw, Parkhomov changed to use a separate tube for the heater… IMO this was a terrible design choice. Makes no sense.

Re: [Vo]:Questions Raised by Parkhomov Experiment Failure

2015-03-01 Thread Bob Higgins
From the pictures I saw, Parkhomov changed to use a separate tube for the heater. If nichrome does make a difference, it would have to be against the alumina reactor tube. So, if you use the heater tube, it wouldn't make any difference if it was kanthal or nichrome - the H2 would leak out of the

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Bob Cook
If the original estimate for NGC 1277 as suggested in Wikipedia was that it was Once thought to harbor a black hole so large that it contradicted modern galaxy formation and evolutionary theories, re-analysis of the data revised it downward to roughly a third of the original estimate, existing

Re: [Vo]:Questions Raised by Parkhomov Experiment Failure

2015-03-01 Thread Axil Axil
Now we know what Rossi has been struggling with from the very beginning: control. This is why DGT and Rossi parted ways. DGT says that they had solved the control problem by using arc discharge. My guess is that Rossi uses RF to tame the reaction. It has taken Rossi 4 years to solve the control

RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
Agreed! _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 8:04 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began? Isn’t it bizarre how most physicists will embrace that load of cosmic crap (FTL

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Alain Sepeda
cold fusion really have a problem. I've seen very conservative science forum like future science, bloggers start with a bang, or goatguy being unable to accept anything on cold fusion , despite busines, circumstantial, kilowatt, 50 sigma, isotopic, varied or identical replications... while they

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Mauro Lacy
Hi Jones, thanks, I have in fact tuned again into Vortex a couple of months ago. Cosmology is too young a science. The Universe is not only expanding, but expanding at an accelerated rate. This poses a very serious problem for any Big Bang model where the expansion energy comes for the

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Paul St. Denis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Isn’t it bizarre how most physicists will embrace that load of cosmic crap (FTL expansion) without the least bit of real evidence for it (other than a

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread ChemE Stewart
Spacetime, including our atmosphere is wormy stringy http://www.andersoninstitute.com/wormholes.html http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/02/23/sail-the-seven-dimensional-seas/ Earth's core is 6-D vacuum brane toroid and our weather disturbances are one more dimension warping, inflating decaying

[Vo]:Short info for March 1, 2015

2015-03-01 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Friends, I have to move in the US in order to send you such writings as: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/day-7-window-to-next-week.html at a proper time. However here I get some information earlier therefore here I am,, here I remain Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania