http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202005/MoonModel_F04.pdfThe
last pages(71-72) of this document on figure 14 becomes relevant in certain
relativistic speculations. The four diagonals bisecting the cube are said to be
magnetically neutral with respect to each other, and do not
a.ashfield wrote:
I don't recall either of them taking their victims to court.
> It was the other way around.
>
Your analysis is too narrow. You are missing the point. The point is,
people such as Madoff and Rossi have enormous chutzpah, and they are
reckless. They will
I do not recall that the IH/Rossi contract says anything about the nature of a
customer being a manufacturer. The customer may have only been an energy sink,
a steam condenser for example.
The objective of the test was to produce energy for 350 days out of a year.
I’ll review the contract
I don't recall either of them taking their victims to court.
It was the other way around.
AA
On 2/2/2017 7:54 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield > wrote:
At this point it strikes me that it is extraordinarily unlikely
that a
a.ashfield wrote:
> At this point it strikes me that it is extraordinarily unlikely that a
> fraudster would take the supposed victim (IH) to court.
>
Your personal level of incredulity is not a valid metric. Look at famous
scams such as Ponzi or Bernie Madoff. They
Subject: Radiola III up and running
opps the wrong video was sent the corrected link is pasted below.
This is a short video showing the operation of a 1924 super regenerative
battery operated radio receiver. It's back into service.
opps the wrong video was sent the corrected link is pasted below.
This is a short video showing the operation of a 1924 super regenerative
battery operated radio receiver. It's back into service.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/operation.mp4
Frank Znidarsic
This is a short video showing the operation of a 1924 super regenerative
battery operated radio receiver. It's back into service.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/operation.wmv
Frank Znidarsic
Giovanni,
This "valid customer" detail should come out during deposition.
I suspect the IH Attorney will be relentless with tough questions, and
for once, Rossi will be cautioned not to throw a tantrum and walk out.
(he could do so nevertheless).
The most unfortunate possibility of all -
Not just a customer, but a valid, legit, independent customer, not a
Rossi's agent.
Giovanni
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> To cut to the chase ... Rossi's claim for supplying a massive amount of
> steam to a customer in an adjoining space (which
Jones,
I understand the legal system well enough. Like in England, the law is
an ass (as stated by the Chief Justice.)
What I said was that, relatively speaking, the customer is unimportant.
What really matters is if there is a commercial LENR plant. I've read
the supposed contract (I
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-02-2017-lenr-info.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Adrian,
Perhaps the problem is that you do not understand the US legal system,
insofar as you maintain that it "doesn't matter" that Rossi may have
committed fraud by inventing a fake customer and fake manufacturing
plant to use the steam.
Note - I am not saying he did or didn't invent
Adrian—
IMHO if anyone is blundering its IH. They way under estimate Rossi’s resolve
and intelligence, not even considering his lawyers input and their incentives.
I agree with your conclusions.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: a.ashfield
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017
Jones, contrary to what you wrote, I don't think it matters a damn
whether the customer was real of not. IH failed to find a customer for
a year and possibly Rossi decided just to find a suitable heat sink.
What matters is how the 1 MW plant performed. Did it really produce 1
MW with a COP of
Higgins’s question about the schematic plan of the plant should settle
everything.
Normally a system producing steam as the heat transfer agent will have a
condenser with a condensate pump in the sump of the condenser. There is a
negative pressure—not a back pressure as Jed has suggested.
To cut to the chase ... Rossi's claim for supplying a massive amount of
steam to a customer in an adjoining space (which no one from IH was
allowed to visit) could be instantly validated if there was indeed a
real customer using the steam.
If there was no customer, and the steam was not
Has there yet been published in the court documents, a schematic of Rossi's
system showing the location of the pumps and flow gauge?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
> Yesterday I corrected the Rossi calculations. I failed to note the water
> was above
Yesterday I corrected the Rossi calculations. I failed to note the water was
above 100C with no pressure to keep it in the liquid phase. The metering device
cannot function with a compressible fluid. It will always measure higher values
than measuring it as a single liquid phase at the input.
19 matches
Mail list logo