Re: On Kervran, Chickens, Neutrinos, and Power Lines

2004-08-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Frederick Sparber's message of Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:52:28 -0500: Hi, [snip] >It keeps looking more like Kervran's chickens were lingering near neutrino-modulating >power lines. [snip] Another interesting little factoid is that the magnetogyric ratio of U235 is -0.4926E7 rad/T/sec. This

Re: Podkletnov's latest claims

2004-08-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to William Beaty's message of Sun, 08 Aug 2004 17:12:59 -0700: Hi, [snip] >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, thomas malloy wrote: > >> Hum, let's hope that independent researchers have more luck >> reproducing Podkletnov's latest claims then they did on his claims of >> antigravity. > > >This is ALMOST

Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Erikbaard
The "poor taste" reply makes it pretty clear that he revels in having it. Another of the nonapologies and nondisclaimers ("...but they should") that have become his hallmark.   Erik Baard

Re: Podkletnov's latest claims

2004-08-08 Thread William Beaty
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, thomas malloy wrote: > Hum, let's hope that independent researchers have more luck > reproducing Podkletnov's latest claims then they did on his claims of > antigravity. This is ALMOST a hobbyist project. Except that Podkletnov used superconductor pucks larger than 10cm diam

Re: HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:05:56 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Caveat: Some of the following is fact, some tinged >with conspiracy theory, some closer to Sci-Fi, but the >result is, hopefully… at least entertaining. It certainly is. :) [snip] >Is it also a prime (maybe the bes

RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Jeff and Dorothy Kooistra
No, I think this is Park's idea of a joke--you can just bet that as soon as the news broke that Gene was dead, someone or other made sure Park heard about it. The man has not shown an ounce of class for as long as he's been doing his column, so why should he start now? Kooistra >This has to b

RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Steven Krivit
I'd ask him personally, but I don't want to provoke him any more that I already have... and will... At 02:51 PM 8/8/2004 -0400, you wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bothe

Re: HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Wilfred Chipman
Jeane, Well, Jones sure has done it this time. This is the most amazing scenario, not to mention bit of detective work, I have come across in a long time. The science as well as the history is credible. Hot and warm fusion people for years have speculated about He3's value as a component in fusio

HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Jones Beene
Caveat: Some of the following is fact, some tinged with conspiracy theory, some closer to Sci-Fi, but the result is, hopefully… at least entertaining. Is it a bit cynical to assume that big swings in policy at the highest levels of government have usually been designed to benefit the privileged f

Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Terry Blanton
Jed Rothwell wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. He said it was "poor taste" which implies intent.

RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. - Jed