Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> : Harry Veeder wrote
>>
>> How would one measure thrust from sublimation to check the theoretical
>> predictions?
>>
> Try two or four trays of dry or water ice in a Crookes Radiometer type
> setup
>
> Frederick
>>
>> Harry
>>
I did not kn
At 12:11 am 14-01-05 -0500, Standing Bear wrote:
> On this, suppose that there is another wrinkle, this one
> of time. Suppose time were multidimensional as space is,
> then this would give rise to time lines ad infinitum, accomodating
> all manner of would be paradoxes as long as one kept to the
January 13, 2005
Vortex,
Snail mail being what it is, I received the January issue (Volume 58 issue
One) of Physics Today yesterday. There is a short column in the 'Issues and
Events' listed in the Table of Contents titled "Cold Fusion gets a chilly
Encore", by Toni Feder.
The article goes over t
On Saturday 08 January 2005 16:34, Harry Veeder wrote:
> http://www.technewsworld.com/story/39360.html
>
> COMMENTARY
>
> The Big Science Chill
>
> By Sonia Arrison
> TechNewsWorld
> 01/07/05 5:00 AM PT
>
> When smart people in California's tech mecca fail, they pick up the pieces
> and the communi
On Saturday 11 December 2004 21:12, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The recent discussions of FTL signalling and its
> repercussions is interesting to me, and is something
> which has troubled my mind for many years. After
> studying special relativity, particularly the
> implications of re
--- Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, right on two counts. I have it! Most folks
> here just call it cabin
> fever.
This one's a bit expensive; but, I bet you could build
one with some gro-lux tubes:
http://www.alaskanorthernlights.com/
A recent PBS program showed they *do* wor
At 11:20 AM 1/13/5, Grimer wrote:
>Mmm...very interesting. I wish I could have written all that. ;^)
>
It's amazing how stuff one posts here comes back in various forms at later
times.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
: Harry Veeder wrote
>
> How would one measure thrust from sublimation to check the theoretical
> predictions?
>
Try two or four trays of dry or water ice in a Crookes Radiometer type
setup
Frederick
>
> Harry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not so sure about that numerically challenged part, Horace.
>
> I come up with about 90 lbs thrust per square meter for CO2 sublimation, and
> about 20 lbs per square meter for H2O ice sublimation thrust.
>
> With "CO2 Smoke and Mirrors" you c
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 03:42 am 13-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
>
>> Do thing 1 and thing 2 come with a thing-force to keep them together?
>
>
> By George, (s)he's got it, Pickering. By George, (s)he's got it. ;^)
>
> Of course they do. That was implicit in the analogy.
> It's
At 10:06 13/01/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>Fred,
>
>> > Beta-aether
>
>> Either that or 3 K radiation.
>
>The two (CMB and B-A) ARE connected in a surprising way.
>
>> a velocity of about 325 meters per second at 1.3
>KW/meter^2 solar or CF photon insolation. That translates to
>a significant Specific
Dave wrote:
> The biggest controversy surrounding the Wright brothers is whether they
> were actually the first to fly. I gather New Zealand has a prior claim
> with Richard Pearse.
>
Others got into the air before the Wrights, including Pearse. The critical
issue is controlled flight, including t
I think people here must be spreading the word about the
book, because downloads increased from around 15 per day to 35 yesterday,
and 35 more today (so far). Thank you everyone. Obviously, I have no
advertising budget, and word-of-mouth is the only way to promote the book
-- or the web site, for
Fred,
> > Beta-aether
> Either that or 3 K radiation.
The two (CMB and B-A) ARE connected in a surprising way.
> a velocity of about 325 meters per second at 1.3
KW/meter^2 solar or CF photon insolation. That translates to
a significant Specific Impulse (isp).
Yes. Although it is far less (6x
Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Fred,
>
> > What's causing the vapor pressure of Dry or Water Ice at
> those low temperatures?
>
> Beta-aether
>
Either that or 3 K radiation.
>
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0101365/2003/09/04.html
> > "According to the above chart, carbon dioxide of
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=585&ncid=585&e=1&u=/nm/20050113/sc_nm/energy_canada_solar_dc_1
interesting story.
new solar cell is 30 percent efficient. nice. very nice.
Leaking Penisaying that it doesn't involve ZPee? :-)
Frederick
> [Original Message]
> From: leaking pen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: vortex-l
> Date: 1/13/05 9:48:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Does Dry & H2O Ice Tap ZPE?
>
> sublimation and natural balancing of concentration of states. the
> only time yo
Greetings
The first
sound waves left imprint on the Universe http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/aas_universe_structure_050111.html
The Primordial Harmonic Template of the Universe (
QuantumSpherical Standing Wave )" Everything is determined,
the beginning as well as the end, by
Fred,
> What's causing the vapor pressure of Dry or Water Ice at
those low temperatures?
Beta-aether
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0101365/2003/09/04.html
> "According to the above chart, carbon dioxide of
about -122°C will have a vapor pressure of 7.5 mmHg, so the
solid carbon dioxide that is vapo
sublimation and natural balancing of concentration of states. the
only time youd have a vp of 0 would be at absolute zero, above that,
your still going to have a certain amount constantly going back and
forth between solid and gas states. nothing unusual about it.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:40:47
What's causing the vapor pressure of Dry or Water Ice at those low temperatures?
http://radio.weblogs.com/0101365/2003/09/04.html
"According to the above chart, carbon dioxide of about -122°C will have a vapor pressure of 7.5 mmHg, so the solid carbon dioxide that is vaporizing near the south
Can the solar sail beat losing a few grams of CO2 (Dry Ice) per square meter at 1.3 KW/meter^2?
http://www.planetary.org/solarsail/
http://www.planetary.org/
Frederick
At 10:53 PM 1/12/5, Grimer wrote:
>At 09:09 pm 12-01-05 -0900, Horace wrote:
>
>>
>>Fred, I am so glad you are still around. You are one of the few remaining
>>list members who seems to not be numerically challenged.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Horace Heffner
>
>
>Are you suffering from the effects of SAD
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> Fred, I am so glad you are still around. You are one of the few remaining> list members who seems to not be numerically challenged.> > At 5:29 PM 1/12/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:>> I propose using very large cylinders of solid CO2 with the ends pointed>>toward the su
At 03:42 am 13-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
> Do thing 1 and thing 2 come with a thing-force to keep them together?
By George, (s)he's got it, Pickering. By George, (s)he's got it. ;^)
Of course they do. That was implicit in the analogy.
It's no good having a sail and a hull if they haven't go
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 06:05 pm 12-01-05 -0500, you wrote:
>> Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> At 03:24 pm 12-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
>
>
>> Your protons and neutrons are not like the protons and neutrons
>> known to physics. Neutrons and protons both have inertia a
26 matches
Mail list logo