I am resending the forward since the previous Subject Title did no include
the [VO}. Apologies.
Forward from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Akira Kawasaki)
[Original Message]
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6/23/2006 2:00:44 PM
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New
time, and America has IMHO, done quite well economically. The best thing
that can happen to encourage energy efficiency is for gasoline to go to
$5 per gallon.
This would mean price going down over here in Europe :)
Michel
If calorimetry were universally accepted as proof, then the
excess heat of cold fusion would not be in doubt.
But because of the lack of universal standards and other vagaries
in calorimetry, it is unlikely that it will ever suffice to
demonstrate the reality of LENR to the most ardent of
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=1087sid=aB.YH1WLpQgo
GM Plans Gas-Electric Car to Catch Up to Toyota, People Say
June 23 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp., losing sales to
fuel-efficient cars from Toyota Motor Corp., is developing a
hybrid-electric vehicle with a battery that
http://www.alternate-energy.net/R/news.php?detail=n1151100689.news
http://tinyurl.com/grvcr
and
http://www.energyfromair.com/
Well Jones, I suggest you are starting with a false assumption.
Calorimetry is considered proof in every other field and in every other
application. Good calorimetry, i.e. that which can not be questioned by
a rational person, can be done and has been done in the LENR field.
Granted, a lot of
What's this battery that recharges at any outlet nonsense Terry, have they
never heard of the Sprain motor?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 7:23 PM
Subject: [Vo]: GM Plans PHEV
Hi Ed,
I can't disagree with anything you have said, except for the
implied idealism: that eventually everything will work out for the
best if we simply continue to follow the tried-and-true recipe
which has gotten us this far in science.
Do we have the luxury of that methodology: i.e. to
I couldn't disagree more. Jones is quite right that if we did have a CF process
with enough COP for self-powering (he said 4, sounds reasonable to me), then a
self powered demo would be the very first thing to do. Understanding would
probably come shortly after, with the help of the
At 01:32 pm 24/06/2006 -0400, you wrote:
http://www.alternate-energy.net/R/news.php?detail=n1151100689.news
http://tinyurl.com/grvcr
Tension (negative strain energy)
in the swing suspension is fine.
But one must not forget the
compression (positive strain energy)
in the columns wot stops the
The steam engine was developed before the laws of thermodynamics
were fully worked out.
Harry
ENGINE AND MOTOR
Two closely-related words investigated
http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/engine.htm
Hi Jones,
Actually, my approach is just the opposite of idealism. If we could
make a CF cell work well enough to make a practical demonstration, we
would not be having this discussion because the effect would be
demonstrated, whether we understood the effect or not. We can not make
this
Jones Beene wrote:
But because of the lack of universal standards and other vagaries
in calorimetry . . .
As Storms noted, calorimetry is the basis of a large part of modern science
technology. It is, in fact, the universal standard in a wide range of such
chemistry, nuclear reactions and in
Michel Jullian writes:
I couldn't disagree more. Jones is quite right that if we did have a CF
process with enough COP for self-powering (he said 4, sounds reasonable to
me), then a self powered demo would be the very first thing to do.
But we do not have any such thing. This is like saying if
At 02:49 PM 6/24/2006 -0600, Edmund Storms wrote:
Hi Jones,
Actually, my approach is just the opposite of idealism. If we could make
a CF cell work well enough to make a practical demonstration, we would
not be having this discussion because the effect would be demonstrated,
whether we
Jed (many thanks for having sent the CDs BTW, will tell you when I receive
them), in the mood to pick up a fight, wrote:
Michel Jullian writes:
I couldn't disagree more. Jones is quite right that if we did have a CF
process with enough COP for self-powering (he said 4, sounds reasonable to
Doing some number crunching to see how a kilogram of
pretreated water could deliver the equivalent of
2 gallons of petrol (241E8 Joules from the 6.6E25
hydrogen atoms plus 3.3E25 oxygen atoms of H2O
or OH "hydroxyl" species promoted by NOx.
Considering only the H atoms, each would have to
At 05:04 PM 6/24/2006 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
But because of the lack of universal standards and other vagaries
in calorimetry . . .
As Storms noted, calorimetry is the basis of a large part of modern
science technology. It is, in fact, the universal standard in a wide
The energyfromair link doesn't work for me -- complains my version of
Internet Explorer is too old (I'm using FireFox 1.5.0.4 -- somehow I
don't think upgrading would help...)
The first link is a tad strange. The string on a pendulum doesn't
really do any work, save to the extent that it
20 matches
Mail list logo
