- Original Message -
> > > > Like Jed, I'll take a stab at answering this conundrum. I'll > also be > > the first to admit that my comments are highly eccentric, > personally> opinionated, and filled with a kind of new age mystic > drivel that > > would have likely irked Sir Arthur, bein
I friend of mine rvargo has an IQ of 160. He has proven to have a vision of
future events.
He writes:
It is worse than what is stated. The Chinese hold 1 trillion of out debt.
They could put us in a depression in 24 hrs at any time they choose. A major
attack on Saudi oil would spike oil to
@Jed
Yes, Sir Arthur; but, it reminds me of the mythical king. Actually
apropos! :-)
@SVJ
I, too, felt the pain of the demise of the earth in my teenage
reading; but, as an adult I saw it as a metaphor for the
ornithological egg or the cocoon of the butterfly. Extending the
metaphor, the over
Could Vorts look over the paragraph below and give me their opinion on it (also
please check the maths). It is part of an article I am writing for our
newspaper on sustainability.
<
Terry sez:
> I never did understand what inspired Sir Clarke to write this novel.
>
> Terry
Like Jed, I'll take a stab at answering this conundrum. I'll also be
the first to admit that my comments are highly eccentric, personally
opinionated, and filled with a kind of new age mystic drivel that
- Original Message
From: Jed Rothwell
> I would like to see that. If anyone has a copy, please send it to me.
I will check the Chamblee library.
Looks like there is CD ROM version from Grolier which is only available to
libraries:
http://www.grolier.com/gi/products/reference/esf/d
Terry Blanton wrote:
I never did understand what inspired Sir Clarke to write this novel.
That should be "Sir Arthur."
That's an interesting question. Yesterday a reviewer wrote: "In
Childhood's End, Clarke revealed himself as a fatalist and a mystic."
I told him I disagree. He referred me
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:49:58 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>Forgot to add - we also require some extra O2 to be bubbled through the
>barrel, otherwise the end product is all steam. Not sure the pressure-swing
>device enrichment device is efficient enough for very chea
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Jed Rothwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What ran through my mind then were the words from the prologue of
> Clarke's "Childhood's End" describing the invasion of Earth by a
> fleet of extraterrestrial spacecraft:
>
> "This was the moment when history held its
Forgot to add - we also require some extra O2 to be bubbled through the barrel,
otherwise the end product is all steam. Not sure the pressure-swing device
enrichment device is efficient enough for very cheap O2.
Maybe Robin knows?
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian
> it occ
Speaking of having one's head in the ozone... not that anyone has ever accused
this writer of that problem ;-)
In one of the great ironies of biology - the same deadly UV radiation from the
sun, which causes cancer and/or creates an ozone layer and other toxicity - is
also responsible for US (
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian
> it occurred to me that the best way to do it "in situ" was to use the water
> itself as a discharge surface, a quick Googling showed this has indeed been
> done with what seems to be good results, see
http://www.center.bg.ac.yu/plasma/plasm
Thanks for the historical enlightenment, I had no idea, ignorant me! Inspired
by this I just googled up Paris, Texas, but it doesn't seem to have been
founded by French people, in spite of their mockup Eiffel tower, too bad :)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: R C Macaulay
To: vortex-
Jones answered, with ample supporting arguments and evidence, my question about
efficiency of UV tube based methods: not efficient at all, as I had suspected.
Going back to gas discharge (DBD, the classical process), it occurred to me
that the best way to do it "in situ" was to use the water its
For pure kill power, ozone has the right stuff, no residual and good
reduction properties. Bleach must be destructed after doing it's job.The
task is getting ozone in the right place immediately on generation. Like
Chlorine gas.. the first 3 seconds holds the kill power. We are looking at
"shap
This is conventional technology as far as I can tell, but interesting:
http://rfdesign.com/military_defense_electronics/nuclear-accelerated_beta_radiation/
"Nuclear-accelerated generator harvests beta radiation
Oct 1, 2007 12:00 PM
David Weber, owner and founder of Executive Engineering, is
d
On March 24, 1989, I picked up the Wall Street Journal and had one of
the biggest shocks in my life. I read about cold fusion. I distinctly
remember thinking:
* If this is real, it changes everything. As a scientist remarked a
few weeks later, if true it is the most important discovery since f
Producing ozone using UV, why not, that's indeed what the sun does in the upper
atmosphere and what makes the sky blue, how does it compare with the DBD method
in terms of efficiency and cost?
Is ozone a requirement, if not maybe you could produce bleach on the spot.
Michel
P.S. If I talked li
Howdy Richard, what makes you think the classical glass tube dielectric
barrier discharge ozone production process (which you are using IIRC) can
be >improved upon, and what's troubling about it?
Michel
Several things Michel.
The demand is increasing, ozone gas is expensive, ozone doesn't st
Howdy Richard, what makes you think the classical glass tube dielectric barrier
discharge ozone production process (which you are using IIRC) can be improved
upon, and what's troubling about it?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: R C Macaulay
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, Ma
Jones Beene wrote:
From: R C Macaulay
> There are Vorts here that have an idea on the subject that may help
our industry.
Actually, there are some ways to pull this hydrino-like process off,
which I can envision, but it would not be not be easy to do, and since
Mills has already burned th
21 matches
Mail list logo
