Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: does
his reactor produce the amount of energy that he says it does, and can
his processes produce novel, and useful materials. If the answer to
I came across a study a few years ago that showed that the US presently has
more forested land than it did in the year 1900. My personal observation
verifies that. The fields around the house I grew up in, and the house I
have live in now (33 yrs.) have all grown over with forest. Historical
Howdy Jeff,
Same here in Texas. Before 1870 range prairie grass fires could sweep
across whole counties that acted to prevent forests from gaining a foot
hold.
Interesting arguments for and against greenhouse effect. Al Gore and Rush
Limburger cheese et al should both be proud of their
A lot of marginal farmland in the United States has been returned to
forest land.
It's the same throughout much of New England -- lots of woods, but it's
all second growth because it all was farmland a century ago. It was
terrible farmland, but in the absence of the Interstate system and
Other possibilities based on my personal experience with these things:
1) Their counsel told them to STFU and quit bragging about things for
which they yet have no patent protection.
and
2) They encountered challenges of scale when they tried to create a
commercial application.
Or, as one of
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:24 PM, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all are ducking
There is absolutely nothing wrong with making ethanol from corn. Our
forefathers certainly did it.
They were not so foolish as to use it for transportation, however.
Terry
Alcohol and driving don't
slaps head
Terry
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: does his
reactor produce the amount of energy
Among the most brain-dead of all the environmental
proposals being floated around to combat greenhouse
gases, is the kind of carbon sequestration where CO2
is pumped into the earth... this is beyond silly for
so many reasons... But here is an interesting
development:
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:51 PM
Indeed momentum p is the denominator of the De Broglie wavelength h/p, my
mistake. So in fact the more immobile the target deuteron, the less close the
incident
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What is missing from Mills' publications, and apparaently the scientific
literature as well, is data on the effective range of the resonant transfer
effect, or the 'cross section'.
[snip]
My bet is that actual
Tomis,
It's 'RandEll' not 'RandAll'.
sigh
T
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slaps head
Terry
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
...it sounds crazy at first; since more coal could be
required for removing CO2 than what is burned, until
you think about the possible advantages.
[snip]
What happens to the cyclic carbonates when they reach
Thomas won't get an A then? ;)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
Tomis,
It's 'RandEll' not 'RandAll'.
sigh
T
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:05:33 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Indeed two immobile d's wouldn't attempt much I don't think, but isn't it ok
if _one_ d in the pair, namely the incident one, makes the attempt, as in the
Desorbing vs Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What is missing from
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:52:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Peter Zimmerman advanced the 'contact' agument on another forum some time
ago. The radii of a H atom and typical catalyst, such as Ar+, are so small
that if contact were required, the probability of reaction would
Robin,
Although it seems to make sense, something doesn't fit in your center of mass
frame of reference and therefore equal De Broglie wavelengths (DBW) paradigm:
in that frame, as you say, when the particles are stationary relative to one
another, the DBW is infinite, hence no longer
You have a far greater command of the language.
Terry
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas won't get an A then? ;)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27,
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
The probability of reaction is quite small, in fact Ar+ is not a very good
catalyst. Nevertheless, contacts happen all the time, otherwise gas pressure
wouldn't exist.
MC: Gas pressure results for impacts with the
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:33:07 +0200:
Hi,
Robin,
Although it seems to make sense, something doesn't fit in your center of mass
frame of reference and therefore equal De Broglie wavelengths (DBW) paradigm:
in that frame, as you say, when the particles are
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:26:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The probability of reaction is quite small, in fact Ar+ is not a very good
catalyst. Nevertheless, contacts happen all the time, otherwise gas pressure
wouldn't exist.
MC: Gas pressure results for impacts with the
22 matches
Mail list logo
