woah...somebody has waaay too much time on their hands.
but he must be a cool cat, he's got a good name
Meow
At 08:45 AM 6/26/2008, you wrote:
We really need Steve's help in getting Phoenix micrographs from Mars
published in real time.
http://www.stevethecat.com/mars.htm
I expect we'll
I found the following article amusing in a macabre sort of way.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/27/markets/oil.ap/index.htm
Especially the statement:
Meanwhile, the head of Libya's national oil company
said the country may cut crude production because
the oil market is well supplied, according
In reply to Taylor J. Smith's message of Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:44:19 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Is it hopeless to remind our fellow citizens that we didn't
leave the Stone Age because we ran out of stones?
What makes you think we left the stone age? :)
[snip]
Howdy Steven,
Actually, what the articles states is the dollar devaluation is the driving
force behind the rush of investment professionals toward a safe haven in
crude oil futures. This haven is much better than gold.
The price of crude is now the best gauge of the true value of the US
See:
Main article in Japanese
http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/146/146085/
Photos from article, with English labels
http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/146/146087/img800.html
http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/146/146089/img800.html
http://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/146/146088/img800.html
- Jed
Howdy Richard,
Howdy Steven,
Actually, what the articles states is the dollar
devaluation is the driving force behind the rush
of investment professionals toward a safe haven in
crude oil futures. This haven is much better than
gold. The price of crude is now the best gauge of
the true
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Steven Krivit wrote:
woah...somebody has waaay too much time on their hands.
Actually I still have 411 vortex messages unread. I'm way behind on
everything. The above was somewhat of an acknowledgment of Jones
Beene's post:
On May 31, 2008, at
I'm hopefully not given to apoplexy, but this just about did it for me:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/us/27solar.html?
_r=2oref=sloginoref=slogin
http://tinyurl.com/4bo5b5
Faced with a surge in the number of proposed solar power plants, the
federal government has placed a moratorium on
Not to worry Horace,
Todays national news reports that 16 Ethanol plants filed for bankruptcy and
another 15 are likely to close in the USA alone this year
Richard,
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vortex-L vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 27,
We have seen this approach many times in the past. When this government
is given two choices, it will always pick the least intelligent one.
Hopefully, the next administration will reverse these decisions.
Ed
Horace Heffner wrote:
I'm hopefully not given to apoplexy, but this just about did
Mike Carrell wrote:
When your are promoting a technology that may lead to covering
square miles of land in our thirst for energy, it is well take a
look at the environmental consequences of doing so. *Not* doing so
got us where we are.
Plus, I believe there is plenty of private and state
Every normal person is in favor of protecting the environment, Mike.
Its the way it is done or the hypocrisy shown by the administration that
is so stupid. For example, drilling in the coastal waters or in Alaska
is all right even though the harm to the environment is obvious. But,
covering
Years ago, the EPA was given the mandate to carry out environmental impact
assessments on large federal projects. It would have been prudent and
forward looking for EPA some years ago to have studied the impacts of
large-scale solar paneling. There was nothing -- except a lack of
responsibility
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Meanwhile watch Blacklight Power over the next few years. Utility-scale
reactors are on their ajenda. Hydrogen from water.
If that happens, all bets are off, including cold fusion. Why they plan to
make hydrogen I do
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The informaltion about Nanosolar with printed PV with 14% efficiency looks
most interesting, but you need to deploy a few square miles to find the
'gotchas' through wind, sand and rain.
[snip]
Note that 14% is the
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:59:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Why they
plan to make hydrogen I do not know. Why not just react the stuff in
a fuel cell and make electricity.
[snip]
I think the idea of using Hydrogen is as a transport fuel. My question is why
not use their
16 matches
Mail list logo
