In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:09 -0400: Hi, [snip] >The informaltion about Nanosolar with printed PV with 14% efficiency looks >most interesting, but you need to deploy a few square miles to find the >'gotchas' through wind, sand and rain. [snip] Note that 14% is the *best* they have achieved. It would be interesting to know what the average is.
- [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects R C Macaulay
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Project... Mike Carrell
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Project... rvanspaa
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Pro... Mike Carrell
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energ... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar E... Mike Carrell
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar E... Horace Heffner
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Edmund Storms
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects rvanspaa
- [Vo]:Re: U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Project... Michel Jullian
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Edmund Storms
- [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Taylor J. Smith
- Re: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Nick Palmer
- RE: [Vo]:U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects Lawrence de Bivort

