In reply to  Mike Carrell's message of Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The informaltion about Nanosolar with printed PV with 14% efficiency looks 
>most interesting, but you need to deploy a few square miles to find the 
>'gotchas' through wind, sand and rain.
[snip]
Note that 14% is the *best* they have achieved. It would be interesting to know
what the average is.

Reply via email to