http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf
OBJECTIVE
The purpose here is to provide a means of extracting energy upon
demand from the zero point field (ZPF), by utilization of the
Casimir force.
FUNDAMENTAL METHOD
The following method is intended to provide a means to
I realize now that the process can be reversed and used for heating. Can
anyone help me to understand how. To what degree would the radiation be
absorbed?
David
--
David Jonsson
Sweden
phone callto:+46703000370
By analogy, if one had two magnetic plates (opposite poles facing) they will
attract strongly but afterwards they cannot easily be slid apart sideways
because of the flux/field which resists this. Does this spoiler truly not
apply to the Casimir force?
Nick
From Nick palmer,
By analogy, if one had two magnetic plates (opposite poles facing) they will
attract strongly but afterwards they cannot easily be slid apart sideways
because of the flux/field which resists this. Does this spoiler truly not
apply to the Casimir force?
Nick
Horace,
You know, it takes a lot less energy to slide two magnets apart
perpendicular to their poles than parallel to the poles. Paul got two
of the 2 N50's stuck and it took a special tool with a 3 ft lever to
break them sidewise.
I consider this similar to stopping flowing water with a butterfly
valve
On Jul 4, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Nick Palmer wrote:
By analogy, if one had two magnetic plates (opposite poles facing)
they will
attract strongly but afterwards they cannot easily be slid apart
sideways
because of the flux/field which resists this. Does this spoiler
truly not
apply to the
On Jul 4, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
You know, it takes a lot less energy to slide two magnets apart
perpendicular to their poles than parallel to the poles. Paul got two
of the 2 N50's stuck and it took a special tool with a 3 ft lever to
break them sidewise.
I consider this
A side comment: As Horace has already eluded, anyone who has performed
FEMM simulations will have noticed, the force of like-pole repelling
PMs is less than the forces measured from the same two attractive
opposite-pole PMs positioned at the same distance. This observation
has unfortunately caused
Horace,
I don't know if this would have any bearing on, or be any help with this
thought experiment you are working on, but there is a paper describing the
theorized energy density within various cavities, authored by the late Dr.
Robert Forward. I have it in PDF format if it would be helpful
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:59 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
A side comment: As Horace has already eluded, anyone who has performed
FEMM simulations will have noticed, the force of like-pole repelling
PMs is less than the forces measured from the same two attractive
opposite-pole PMs positioned at the same
On Jul 4, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Horace,
I don't know if this would have any bearing on, or be any help with
this thought experiment you are working on, but there is a paper
describing the theorized energy density within various cavities,
authored by the late Dr.
--- On Fri, 7/4/08, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'd appreciate a copy.
Alrighty. I'll put it online in a bit and send you the URL. Probably be better
that way, as it is a bit large, at 1.2 megs. I don't want to be rude and direct
email something that big.
Say, that was
Horace,
File uploaded.
http://www.fdscience.org/1/aiaa983140.pdf
--Kyle
13 matches
Mail list logo
