Stephen,
thank you for the answer. It appears relativistic velocities like
the muon are not as common as I imagined but even these lesser velocities
you mention would accumulate into time dilation like the protracted decay of
the muon just on a smaller scale. Normally this dilation is int
On 02/07/2010 11:48 AM, Frank wrote:
> What is relativistic velocity of earth to micro and nanoscopic material
> in space? I don’t recall the earths orbital velocity
Roughly 20 miles per second, or about 0.01% C (i.e, C/1)
Escape velocity from the Sun is something like 40 miles per second
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 7 Feb 2010 05:52:36 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>No, most of the 4He reactions occur sub-surface. What do you think
>produces a "volcano"? A surface reaction? The typical 4He produced
>by CF does not have MeV kinetic energy, and is not surface produced.
What is relativistic velocity of earth to micro and nanoscopic material in
space? I don't recall the earths orbital velocity but know M&M were
counting on it in their experiment and then there are also numerous other
frames of motion (the solar system through deep spac etc..) Wouldn't we
expect mo
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
> Cosmic rays are isotropic. At the surface their effect is not
isotropic due to a slight east-west bias due perturbation of cosmic rays by
the earth's magnetic field, however diurnal *flux* variation is small ... I
think it is neutrino flux tha
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner :
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does*
"dissolve" the Pd
surface,
True, but extremely slowly I believe. A Pd anode is known to dissolve
relatively fast in acidic electrolytes such as D2SO4, but I
On Feb 6, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
... IOW muon fusion is ongoing but rare.
I think cosmic ray triggering may be very important to triggering
cold fusion burst events. Also to surface "volcano" creation
frequently observed.
Small but important distinction.
Therefore, I thi
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner :
> Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* "dissolve" the Pd
> surface,
True, but extremely slowly I believe. A Pd anode is known to dissolve
relatively fast in acidic electrolytes such as D2SO4, but I don't
think that's what they used. It is doubtful whet
Underground work is practically a standard for use of energy
discriminating neutron counters, due to the very low neutron flux
from CF experiments. This low flux is why integrating plastic
counters are useful. The following were taken from Dieter Britz's
abstracts:
Zhu R, Wang X, Lu F,
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* "dissolve"
the Pd surface, and (2) previous work has shown that helium
production takes place near but below the surface (order of microns),
while tritium production tends to take place on or very close to the
surface (within a few at
2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
...
> A single
> SRI experiment has been published that made strong efforts to recover all
> the helium, and it came up with, as I recall, about 25 MeV.
That experiment was discussed in the paper submitted by Hagelstein,
McKubre et al to the DOE in 2004:
http://www.
11 matches
Mail list logo
