[Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!

2010-02-15 Thread Taylor J. Smith
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote on 2-14-10: ``Jones, On the surface (no pun intended) this is an absolutely absurd hypothesis [the expanding earth] ...and yet, I love it!'' Jack Smith writes on 2-15-10: Expansion of the Earth can be explained by the continuous creation of matter as proposed by

Re: [Vo]:Muon-catalyzed Ignition

2010-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I do not think Duncan takes the Muon-catalyzed Ignition hypothesis seriously. I think he listed it as one source of cold fusion that was originally considered, for completeness. He also mentioned Paneth and Peters (1926), who retracted. - Jed

[Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update

2010-02-15 Thread Harry Veeder
Feb. 14 update Naudin finds the current through the toroïdal stator coils does not change when a load is applied: http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm (towards the bottom of the page) Harry __ Be smarter than spam.

[Vo]:About the water!

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: ``But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earth was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those Smokers! Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis!.'' Hi All, Earth is

[Vo]:Bismuth as a nuclear catalytic LENR agent

2010-02-15 Thread Horace Heffner
Bismuth-209 appears to be an excellent CF nuclear catalysis agent when used with deuterium. It has 100% abundance. The nuclear catalysis reaction is: 209Bi83 + 2 D* -- 213At85 -- 209Bi83 + 4He2 + 23.847 MeV [-8.560 MeV] (125 ns) The major potential drawbacks are the presence of

[Vo]:If U239 Plutonium, Does Bismuth + Neutrons to Polonium (Yikes!!!)

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
Hey folks! Let' rethink this one!!! I'm not a nuclear physicist, but I have long-wondered: If U238 Plutonium, then mightn't Bismuth tend to go to Polonium---which is really nasty stuff and highly radioactive---many thousands of times more radioactive than Plutonium. You guys are

[Vo]:Need to find Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point.

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
Fran, is 'Skeletal Pd? ---Raney-Like??? To Group, I need to find two metals to make a Raney-Type porous metal sponge. Usually this is done with Ni Al, but they have very high melting points as do all members of the Ni-Pd group. With Al Ni the aluminum is leached out using 5-molar

[Vo]:Need to find Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point.

2010-02-15 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Scott, I believe Rayney is a brand name, skeletal is the generic name for sponge like formations in a catalyst. They avoid the Casimir attraction that opposes a one step construction of a skeletal catalyst by first forming an alloy between a hard and soft metal and then leaching out

Re: [Vo]:More-energetic Blue-shifted safer processed Raney

2010-02-15 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/13/2010 11:19 PM, Francis X Roarty wrote: Scott, The EM drive link is http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/09/is-the-impossible-emdrive-possible/ *[snip] Actually, the untreated powdered alloy is pyrophoric, but once it has been * *treated with sodium

Re: [Vo]:If U239 Plutonium, Does Bismuth + Neutrons to Polonium (Yikes!!!)

2010-02-15 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering about RC just the other day and wondered how his vortex/microwave work has progressed.  I have sent a copy of this to his last known email address hoping that he might stick his welcomed nose in to update

[Vo]:Raney-Type Alloy w/low melt-point sintering

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
Sintered materials tend to have much larger gaps than their constituent particles. I am trying to make cavities, most of which are less 20 nm and many less than 10nm and some all the way down to the size of a single atom removed. Plus I want a relatively thick cavity wall--as much as is

[Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes

2010-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I kid you not. See: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/ I once predicted CF-powered mechanical bats for this purpose, but this is more elegant. I wonder what the range is. QUOTES: . . . After hundreds of mosquitoes (which were kept in the hotel bathroom

RE: [Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes

2010-02-15 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Jed sez: I kid you not. See: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/ ... Thanks Jed! It's nice to see that SDI has found a new purpose, a new enemy. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:Using lasers to zap mosquitoes

2010-02-15 Thread Alexander Hollins
The inventer is missing the real use of the device. He's invented the Pap Blaster! Its a device from a novel by Spider Robinson that tracks camera lenses, and zaps them with light lasers, preventing them from taking coherent pictures. It was sold to celebrities to foil paparazi (hence the name)

[Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?

2010-02-15 Thread Harry Veeder
Naudin's Solid State Generator. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjDbIrKIVXs How do you explain this? Harry __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now

Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update

2010-02-15 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:33 AM 2/15/2010, Harry Veeder wrote: Feb. 14 update Naudin finds the current through the toroïdal stator coils does not change when a load is applied: http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm (towards the bottom of the page) Harry Very nice page. Naudin provides a lot of great

RE: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
I don't see the problem? Since when is it supprising if alternating current or pulsed dc from one coil induces a current in another coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:45:43 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?

Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator?

2010-02-15 Thread Harry Veeder
I have been told the toroidal geometry of the coil means its magnetic field is completely contained inside the coil, so how can it influence another coil? Harry From: Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 12:37:00 AM Subject: RE:

[Vo]:Torroidal Coil?

2010-02-15 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
A Torroidal Coil? Do you mean the coil is like a wire that has been folded in half and then wrapped into a coil? Scott Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:59:11 -0800 From: hlvee...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Solid State Generator? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com I have been told the

Re: [Vo]:Naudin's Feb. 14 Update

2010-02-15 Thread Harry Veeder
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Here is the problem. Steorn claims that input power and output power are not actually related. That increasing input power will not increase output power. Is that what they meant by not related? I think they meant if the operation of the coil can be engineered

Re: [Vo]:Torroidal Coil?

2010-02-15 Thread Harry Veeder
Wm. Scott Smith wrote: A Torroidal Coil? Do you mean the coil is like a wire that has been folded in half and then wrapped into a coil? Scott here is a good illustration: http://web.ncf.ca/ch865/englishdescr/ToroidalCoil.html Harry