Yes, this new neutrino is big news.
And another paper due out soon is worth considering in this regard: Georges
Lochak's four photon model (not yet in publications).
One reason to give it credence is *lepton fourfold symmetry* which would be
implied in having four neutrinos along with
Oops
I should have made it a little clearer why four versions of photons might
translate into four derivative versions of electrons - in the pursuit of
lepton symmetry.
However, doing a good job on that task, especially first thing in the
morning, is a little above my pay scale.
Jones
...
However, in the end I think that physics will want to keep up the
appearance
of verbal continuity is its description of fundamental particles, even if
they are non-particles.
...
It's not only a matter of verbal continuity. Five hundred years of
materialism will not dissappear with the
Whenever any element seems to work better than all of the others, it makes
sense to look at the totality of physical properties for that element. Even
those which may not be obviously connected to the way in which it works
best.
To that end, one must ask: Is there any way in which palladium is
From Seattle:
Just so you guys know, I purchased the domain http://quantumtransition.com
the other day and a kind soul in the UK is designing the site and donating
hosting. It will be up soon.
Please keep us posted as developments unfold.
Some on this list will be curious.
Regards
Steven
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=448456
Thread closed rapidly.
http://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2990936postcount=21
My guess is that someone complained. Typical. I have no idea what the
moderator will decide.
Still, I got in quite a few refutations of the nonsense
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I should mention that Don Hotson has had a look, and is not enthusiastic
about Lochak. His first take on this paper was to consider Lochak's theory
to be a “giant step backwards”, since Don’s interpretation of Dirac
http://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2990888postcount=17
Re: General consensus on Cold Fusion better known as Low Energy
Nuclear Reactions L
Originally Posted by Abd
Lomaxhttp://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2990858#post2990858
Storms is quite conservative.
I don't think
Whow Lane. Thanks. You need to make some money. Sell some stuff please.
Sell videos. Sell Jed''s book.
I want to get the de bed bug technology working so we can sell it.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: seattle truth seattle.tr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed,
From: Terry Blanton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYBqIRM8GiY
Fabulous animation, especially at the end .
10 matches
Mail list logo
