[Vo]:REMOVED: Damon Craig on vortexB-L only

2011-07-31 Thread William Beaty
Removed for repeated flagrant violation of Rule #2 "No Sneering." See: http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html#rules http://amasci.com/weird/vmore.html Mr. Craig remains available via secondary "flamewars" list vortex...@eskimo.com. To subscribe, send a *blank* message to: vortexb-l-requ.

[Vo]:Nobel Physicist Invited to Test 1MW Plant

2011-07-31 Thread Harry Veeder
Nobel Physicist Invited to Test 1MW Plant   http://ecatnews.com/?p=622   Harry

[Vo]:Revisiting The "Whipmag" All-Magnet Motor, saga

2011-07-31 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Changing the subject for a brief spell from the continuing Rossi saga I must confess the fact that I have recently found myself revisiting the "Whipmag" All-Magnet Motor incident. For those who might be curious you can read up on that recent period of history out at peswiki where a dedicated link e

[Vo]:Brian O'Leary

2011-07-31 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Brian O'Leary passed away on July 29, 2011 at the age of 71. http://pesn.com/2011/07/30/9501880_In_Memory_of_Brian_O-Leary/ I met O'Leary at a New Age / UFO convention in the early 90s. He gave a fun demonstration on aikido, chi, and spoon bending. It was O'Leary who first alerted me to the fact

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Alan Fletcher
- Original Message - > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/NET370.shtml > Harry Quite a lot to absorb! The Randall Apx 1 : http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3706appendixa1.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/Randall-Steam-Water-Outflow-70.jpg doesn't make

[Vo]:Somewhat OFF TOPIC Foxconn will replace workers with 1 million robots soon

2011-07-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/07/foxconn-will-replace-workers-with-1-million-robots-in-3-years/242810/ Foxconn is the world's largest computer components company, with 1.3 million workers. They plan to replace most of them in the next 3 years with robots. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Wet Steam: Energy required disperse and suspend small droplets in the vapor state

2011-07-31 Thread Axil Axil
The viability of a system cannot be determined from an examination of just one of its components. Rossi plans to string a number of cat-e's together in series to convert water to dry steam. The steam exiting the first cat-e in series may well be wet. The function of the second... n-th stages

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > The demonstration Krivit observed was NOT a test, as I have said > repeatedly. Rossi told me in advance explicitly that it would not be a test. > Those were his very words! He says "no more tests until October." > In some of the of the earlier tests they did make sure the reservoir wa

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Leguillon wrote: I must ask, Jed... What is your take on this? > > Specifically, the NASA calculations: > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3714appendixelectriconly.shtml > This begins with the statement "Assume that the heat exchanger resistance heater is 100% efficient." That is

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Harry Veeder
also from that page: "Adding 770W to 7kg/hr water flow will produce 3.7% vapour by mass, but 98.4% vapour by volume. "   Harry From: Robert Leguillon >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:46:13 AM >Subject: RE: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3 > > > >I must a

RE: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Robert Leguillon
I must ask, Jed... What is your take on this? Specifically, the NASA calculations: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3714appendixelectriconly.shtml And Summary: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/NASA/18.jpg I don't think that "Curiosity Killed The E-Cat", but I'm finding in much

Re: [Vo]:Wet Steam: Energy required disperse and suspend small droplets in the vapor state

2011-07-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Damon Craig wrote: > I've had enough > of this sort of thing from Lomax, or whoever he really is. Lomax is a real, breathing person; whereas, Cude is a sceptiBot created by the CSICOP. T

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi Report #3

2011-07-31 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-07-31 02:41, Harry Veeder wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/NET370.shtml This was of interest to me: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3705report3.shtml Rossi Goes to NASA On July 14, Rossi met with members of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsvill

Re: [Vo]:Wet Steam: Energy required disperse and suspend small droplets in the vapor state

2011-07-31 Thread Damon Craig
"It propelled my to ask 'what was really happening in the hose?' " This in turn led me to ask about Lewan's remark in his April 19th report where he deduces that steam must reside in the chimney. This is now understandable as a false claim upon the phsical evidence. Thanks for the Leg work, Roth

Re: [Vo]:Wet Steam: Energy required disperse and suspend small droplets in the vapor state

2011-07-31 Thread Damon Craig
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Damon Craig wrote: > > What further amazes me is the degree of disconnect between simple newtonian >> physics and everyday life experiences displayed by so many. >> > > I agree. People seem to have no experience with teapots or steam cleaner

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Hot Water Experiment and the Pointless Wrangle over Steam Dryness

2011-07-31 Thread Damon Craig
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Damon Craig wrote: > > >> Also, it appears the the results of the hot water test were. OK. >>> >>> >> There's no evidence this. >> > > Yes, there is evidence for this > [snip] > Let's have some intellectual rigor here. Let us not

Re: [Vo]:Wet Steam: Energy required disperse and suspend small droplets in the vapor state

2011-07-31 Thread Damon Craig
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Joshua Cude wrote: > All that work, and you didn't come up with an answer? > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Joshua Cude wrote: All that work, and you didn't come up with an answer? I think im not interested in this sort of challenge anymore. I've had enou