Just to make things even more confusing. see
"Trouble with Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory:
Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v4.pdf
Excerpt below.
-Mark
-
"In this work I will argue that the idea of electric and magneti
Definitely not sure this area has had sufficient scrutiny.
Here is quich overwiew of the the scrutiny that it has been given so far.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics
Cheers:Axil
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:02 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Frank, sadly your paper goes over my
It has long been my belief that the government uses inflation to pay off the
debts that are incurred. This is a great way to take away assets from those
who hold them in the form of cash equivalents. The recent actions of the FED
will result in dangerous inflation so now is a good time to borr
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:12:31 -0400
(EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>Jojo Jaro
>
>
>Did you watch the debate. Romney will not increase taxes, not reduce military
>spending, not reduce social spending, not reduce entitlements, and, in the
>process, reduce the dept.
>
I am not aware of any particle that directly responds to a magnetic
field, electrons feel a very real electric force at 90 degrees to a
magnetic field, and magnetic fields are only ever created by electric
fields,
Another good and very important point. The magnetic fields (electromagnitic
gr
Yes a magnetic field comes from kinks in the electric field. Watch Walter
Lewin on Academic Earth he explains this quite well.
Meanwhile the electric induction from a time varying current is in my
understanding due to bending of electric field lines due to acceleration
similar to the effect fr
Wow, what a great batch of articles. The borax article in www,
sparkbangbuzz.com just blew my mind. I did notice the weird electrical
capacitance, but I dismissed that as a Battery effect of electrolysis, the
positive ion build up on the nickel and the negative ion build up on the
electrode. T
Frank, sadly your paper goes over my head.
If you are willing to explain your statement: Relativistic properties are
due to the phase angle of the magnetic field.
Just to quickly reiterate my point of view... (before I rant more about it
anyway)
Protons and electrons posses a radial electric field
Now, how would you *know* that for sure?. I also think it's important to
point out that it's more likely that its You, or Us, who are Alien.
Everything that "We" don't know, in this vast universe, of which, is about
everything
there is, is Alien to Us. You need simply to forget the word "Alie
Nope, you confirmed that you're the Alien. Anyway, the Dinosauurs had no
concept of being a Dinosaur, they just did the only thing they could, and by
no fault of their own and/or an act of god, became extinct. Now, aren't you
glad that you don't have worry about waking up in the morning and bein
Here is the invite in case any of you want to write a paper. Jones it time for
you to get published.
-Original Message-
From: gar
To: gar
Sent: Wed, Oct 3, 2012 12:21 pm
Subject: Reminder - SPSISW 2013 - Call for Abstracts
All,
Reminder that the initial call for abstracts i
In a wire coil, an electric current consists of a slow movement of
electrons, the electric field from these charges though not detectable due
to the presence of the electric field from the protons, never the less
fills space both near and very very far from the wire.
But owing to the (slow) moveme
I was pondering something and wonder if anyone here has any insight on the
subject.
In a wire coil, an electric current consists of a slow movement of
electrons, the electric field from these charges though not detectable due
to the presence of the electric field from the protons, never the less
f
"Cleaning the top of the dolomites with wax" is a metaphor for "wasting
time doing something useless"
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> At 12:33 PM 10/4/2012, Mark Gibbs wrote:
>
> The "clean of the tops of the Dolomites with the wax" and the he-he-ing
> seem unusually od
At 12:33 PM 10/4/2012, Mark Gibbs wrote:
The "clean of the tops of
the Dolomites with the wax" and the he-he-ing seem unusually odd
even for Rossi ... Does anyone know if the former is a bad translation of
a colloquialism?
I took it to mean skiing : (wiki) A tourist mecca, the Dolomites
are famo
Another patent application, also with pulse generator circuitry. Since we
all know cold fusion can't be real, it must be something in the water. ;-)
;-)
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:19 AM, wrote:
> http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/07/ahern-cancels-citi5-appearance/
Alan,
"( He,he,he,he…)" ... I see you left out the next sentence ...
Dear Steven N. Karels:
Your question is inspiring: well, I will not go to Pordenone to clean the
tops of the Dolomites with the wax: it is possible that in the Pordenione
convention I will bring the final results regarding the
Whats up with a new E-CAT
Meeting Scheduled for Pordenone, Italy on Oct 12.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=733&cpage=7#comment-343916
Andrea Rossi
October 2nd, 2012 at 3:17 PM
Dear Steven N. Karels:
Your question is inspiring: well, I will not go to Pordenone to clean the
Dolomi
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ill-fated
At 07:51 AM 10/4/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
This morning I found a link that
may be related to the borax and nickels thing:
http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/els/borax-el.htm
A great find! Here's Popular Science 1936 :
http://books.google.com/books?id=fygDMBAJ&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=borax+recti
You are correct Ken. That is where I went wrong. I knew something didn't
seem correct.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, ken deboer wrote:
> Jack,
> I think you went the wrong way with the total BTU inputted. should be 36
> wh X ~3 btu/w = ~100 btu.
> ken
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jac
To complicate matters, it must be mentioned that plasma electrolysis (glow
discharge) with AC gain possibly be gainful, but we have been talking about
low voltages in the Site's experiment. Here is a paper from Horace on
discharge electrolysis
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/GlowExper.pdf
Jack, the first question that I wish to ask is: Did you accurately measure the
current and voltage being supplied by your supply? It is difficult to believe
that you could carefully adjust the spacing between your electrodes so that
exactly 12 volts appears across them with 1 amp of current flo
http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/07/ahern-cancels-citi5-appearance/
One more point of interest: "negative resistance" with borax
http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/els/borax-el.htm
From: Jeff Berkowitz
And, by golly, here's another interesting note: the energy required to split
water molecules by electrolysis is dramatically reduced in the presence of
Now please, whatever you do, DON'T try to tell me that the Great Annointed
Messiah of a Wannabe Dictator is a Mathematical Genius, because he knows
"exactly" how to con, swindle, bribe, coerce, corrupt, and threaten every
gullible naive weak minded fool and/or tax payer, and ALL for the chance t
From: Jeff Berkowitz
And, by golly, here's another interesting note: the energy required to split
water molecules by electrolysis is dramatically reduced in the presence of
... nickel borate.
http://phys.org/news193055742.html
That is only half the story and is probably disadvantage
Jack,
I think you went the wrong way with the total BTU inputted. should be 36
wh X ~3 btu/w = ~100 btu.
ken
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jack Cole wrote:
> I think I have pretty high heat loss as it is open to the air. Here are
> some pretty conservative calculations assuming no heat loss
A nano powder electrode would increase the number of cracks
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:40 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]: Experimental Results with Nickel and Sodium
Carbonate
You have read what Ed Storms theories ab
Who says I was voting for that moron, err... mormon? Although at least he has
some of the right ideas?
But one thing for sure, I am not voitng for the Usurper-in-Chief. In fact, I'm
pretty sure your Usurper-in-Chief will win. Just don't come crying when we
get a currency collapse, hyperi
And, by golly, here's another interesting note: the energy required to
split water molecules by electrolysis is dramatically reduced in the
presence of ... nickel borate.
http://phys.org/news193055742.html
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> This morning I found a link
This morning I found a link that may be related to the borax and nickels
thing: http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/els/borax-el.htm
I found it, believe it or not, here:
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-159040.html
I had thought mods generally ban CF/LENR topics there, but I guess not
co
Jack Cole wrote:
> A temperature change of 60F for 3.718 oz requires the following BTUs.
>
> 3.178 oz / 16 oz = .199
>
Yikes. I recommend you use SI (metric) units: joules, grams, degrees
Celsius etc. Remember why NASA crashed a rocket into Mars.
http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~gtan/bug/localCopies
Jojo Jaro
Did you watch the debate. Romney will not increase taxes, not reduce military
spending, not reduce social spending, not reduce entitlements, and, in the
process, reduce the dept.
Why would you vote for someone who cannot add? Smoke and mirrors never works.
Frank Znidarsic
wrote:
> Steven B. Krivit, publisher and senior editor of New Energy Times, from
> San Rafael, Calif.: “The Big Picture of Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction
> Research”
>
Oy veh. Who does he think he is? Julian Schwinger?
Krivit is way out of his depth here. He should not be lecturing anyone
about c
I think I have pretty high heat loss as it is open to the air. Here are
some pretty conservative calculations assuming no heat loss and complete
conversion of electrical input to heat. Please check my math / conversions
to see if I am doing this correctly.
1 BTU is the amount of heat needed to r
36 matches
Mail list logo
