Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The problem
is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is going on.
So Rob, you think Andre has proven his claims in many minds. You
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/02/07/mars-rover-spots-metallic-arm_n_2637990.html
Chuck, consider these issues. First, the BEC between atoms has not
been shown to occur except near absolute zero. The claim for such a
structure between hypothetical particles based on a form of
concentrated energy within a structure really does not apply. Second.
once a BEC forms, why
On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:58 AM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The
problem is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is
going on.
So Rob,
Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
In my opinion is what Andrea has discovered to good to be true and
therefore most people won't accept Andrea's findings, even when it bites
them in their noses.
I disagree. Many people would believe him without reservations if he would
only do a
From: Edmund Storms
What constitutes a boson is even uncertain in such a structure.
That is the bare truth, like it or not.
In point of fact - the determination of “boson” identity – whether nuclear,
atomic, molecular, or composite bosons - now borders on the ludicrous.
Eric,
It's good to hear Ron Maimon is trying to develop this theory.
But, the math is truly confusing, bewildering and intimidating -
even to formulate the problem, let alone solve it.
When composite particles are involved, calculating tunneling probability
is almost intractable - even in free
The problem Eric is that once the math is solved, the expected nuclear
reaction is hot fusion, not cold fusion. Consequently, this effort is
a waste of time. This is something the hot fusion field needs to
understand to explain the effect of bombarding materials with
energetic deuterons.
Ed,
I assume you are referring to Maimon's theory, which I am not familiar with.
When you say the expected reaction is hot fusion, are you only
referring to highly energetic collisions?
Do you think the theory X.Z.Li, et al, involving resonant tunneling
(at low kinetic energy), allegedly
Lou,
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how the resulting energy is
dissipated. Such energy is dissipated normally by the fusion product
breaking into two parts, which go off with high energy in directions
required
Hi,
Anyone any idea of the end result of the voting?
Kind regards,
Rob
Energy Ξ Communication
#01 - 2030 BDL water technologies
#02 - 1764 HEVO Power: Wireless Charging
#03 - 1523 Gravaton Energy Resources
#04 - 565 Military OceanEnergy Microgrids
#05 - 522 Altenera
#06 - 513 Transatomic Power Inc
#07 - 450 Solar Wind Energy Tower
#08 - 390 Sail Carousel Wind Turbine
#09 - 340 LENR
Experiments by Piantelli and information about early Rossi systems indicate
that a cold LENR system will produce high energy radiation, but a hot
system will not.
How can we understand the physical meaning of these experimental results?
It has been shown that coherent EMF in the form of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5dmEBbKtHo
attachment: winmail.dat
On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Experiments by Piantelli and information about early Rossi systems
indicate that a cold LENR system will produce high energy radiation,
but a hot system will not.
Alix, this statement does not describe the evidence. All we know is
what
*Yes, but all of these processes you describe are done near absolute zero
while using complex apparatus. This has no relationship to cold fusion.*
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/bose-einstein-condensate-created-at-room-temperature/
From the article: Bose-Einstein condensate created at
*This description has no justification in theory or in observation.
Coherent motion of atoms does no occur spontaneously in a lattice.*
Here is where the size of the micro-particle becomes important.
A 5 micron particle will resonate coherently at a temperature of about 400C,
Nano particles
*If the coherent motion of the lattice is not robust enough, the radiation
produced by the nuclear reactions will be unmodified by the cold lattice
and escape as gamma rays.*
*I have no idea what you are describing by the above comment.*
In my post titled “Right Sizing Nickel Particles” I
Hi Ed,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how the resulting energy is
dissipated.
This appears to be different from what Ron Maimon is proposing.
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:47:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Here is a ring island proposal for pumped hydro in the North Sea. This is
basically a large hole in the ocean:
http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2013/january/belgium-considers-ring-island-energy-storage-scheme.html
In reply to de Bivort Lawrence's message of Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:28:29 -0500:
Hi,
Wouldn't blowing up an asteroid merely create a lot of smaller pieces raining
down on earth, with only a few deflected into non-collision paths.
If the pieces are small enough, they will burn up in the atmosphere
You gotta love those people!
- Jed
This would be true if the pieces came down over a large area and at a moderate
number per hour. I suspect that a large mass of individual pieces coming down
close together would behave a lot like one big one. The energy contained
within the large mass of individual meteorites would be about
Yep, a great bunch of guys.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 9, 2013 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Hunts on local TV
You gotta love those people!
- Jed
24 matches
Mail list logo
