Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The problem
is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is going on.
So Rob, you think Andre has proven his claims in many minds. You say
that you believe him, but I do not get the impression that this is the
general opinion. In my case, I think he has shown that he can make
excess energy on occasion, but that does not seem to be a general
opinion.
Ed, I see what you mean and I agree with your impression; I should have
said that almost nobody believes Andrea, because most people don't seem
to understand what is going on.
In my opinion is what Andrea has discovered "to good to be true" and
therefore most people won't accept Andrea's findings, even when it bites
them in their noses.
However, I have seen there are sometimes those little "gems" that are
indeed "to good to be true" and I think this is one of those.
The issue here is not what causes the reaction, but whether the claims
for a commercial product are justified. The Miley claim, which
started this discussion, is based on a commercial generator of heat.
The question was whether anyone should believe and support this claim.
I still think that what causes the reaction is an important factor that
is overlooked by almost everybody.
And yes, I agree we should support Miley's claim; that's why I also
voted for his claim.
And yes, I think we need this type of commercial generator.
It's sad that Andrea is not pushing his systems and knowledge of how the
system is build-up more to the people.
I think that if he isn't going to do this soon, someone else might beat
him; and that's what he is afraid of, because he or someone else wants
to see some money.
I think Andrea could better sell his knowledge for a small fee to the
people, which I think may result in higher revenues in the long run than
his current scenario.
Could it be that Andrea has advisers who are not open enough for this
"knowledge" scenario and advise him to go for the "large bucks", while
he himself is in a "zweispalt" about this???
As the heat itself results in energy and a high frequency and
therefore keeps the process self-sustaining as long as sufficient
source-material is available.
It would probably be much better for the ITER project to focus on the
frequency of the plasma instead of the temperature.
How do you propose the frequency be measured? It's the temperature
that produces a useful result, so why ignore it?
Yes, the temperature is needed to heat up for example water or generate
electricity, but in my opinion it is not the driving force for the
mechanism.
Therefore people at the ITER project should focus more on the frequency
of the plasma i.s.o. of gaining a high temperature as in the Sun.
And on the current large scale, it seems to me this process is not
self-sustaining, as you can not keep it sufficiently under control
during a longer period.
I.s.o. of building a large system I think they should downsize the
system so they can control the process much better.
As sometimes is said "less is more".
This is also in my opinion the reason why Andrea's reactor vessels seem
to work.
Kind regards,
Rob
Energy Ξ Communication
