RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them

2013-10-15 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Not that I think that gas motion is missing, in fact I believe that both of 
these vacuum effects coexist but obviously at different scales with a strong 
possibility that random gas motion is locally unchanged by the less local CE 
and DCE. Where just gas motion or just CE would be expected to reach 
equilibrium / COE where gas atoms simply move back and forth to average out to 
zero gain.  I believe the geometry and quantum effects allow the normally 
chaotic motions to be organized into an exploitable force where the random 
motion opposes the change in Casimir force [DCE] and allows HUP to  act like 
the hammer against which the now moving anvil that is DCE strikes in this 
confined space. IMHO zero point is the energy source for whatever theory you 
like, disassociating molecules, lowering the coulomb barrier, Lamb pinch or 
what ever. The DCE is of course needs a resonance but can be powered by many of 
the mechanism described in this forum like plasmons, lasers , audio, piezo and 
combinations thereof alternately opposing random motion to greater and lesser 
extents and if my pet theory is correct to a greater and lesser extend based on 
atomic or molecular state of the gas. In this pet theory the energy gain is 
realized by discounting the disassociation threshold lower than the thermal 
gain when the molecule immediately reforms..runaway. Other theories realize 
gain in different manners but I suspect the underlying energy they are 
exploiting is still this normally unexploitable force responsible for gas 
motion..HUP.
Fran

_
From: Frank roarty [mailto:fr...@roarty.biz]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


Agreed it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range and easy to imagine these microtubules 
become interlaced when packed into bulk form and resonate through a range of 
nano geometries. Without even moving the hydrogen is already exposed to dynamic 
values of Casimir force.
Fran

_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.commailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe

  Question: How do you create phonons in a lattice and be able to adjust and 
measure their frequency to get the results suggested by the theory?

Brad - IMO the precise way you have stated this question makes it unlikely 
(i.e. adjusting the lattice frequency), but claimed results may have been 
accomplished in another way.

The trick that Rossi apparently uses is somewhat the inverse of this, and could 
be called serendipity. Intentionally or not, Rossi has used a ceramic 
(SiC)containment structure for the Hot Cat which is semi-coherent in the IR at 
a certain important temperature (very sharp peak). Rossi may not have known of 
the incredibly steep peak of reflectance for SiC at 10-11 microns, leading to 
superradiance - but he was fortunate to be in a particular Italian Lab (with 
Focardi) where SiC is routinely used, so it was available. The result is the 
HotCat.

The optical photons and lattice phonons are locked, and emitted at the same 
semi-coherent frequency. It is laser-like optical emission, not pure coherence 
but superradiant.

IOW the enclosure material of the HotCat itself is superradiant at the desired 
frequency of ~27-28 THz which is 10-11 micron photon wavelength. This photon 
has a mass energy of .113 eV which is the temperature equivalent to 1038 C. 
Many theorists (Hagelstein et al) have noticed this far IR range of activity 
seems to be semi-coherent and related to gain.

Conclusion: The natural IR resonance of SiC happens to be intrinsic to the gain 
of the Rossi Hot Cat, due to its inherent properties at a specific wavelength 
(no need for adjustment)- and gain is achieved by surface plasmon absorption of 
semi-coherent IR irradiation in a positive feedback loop.

If Frank Z's MHz-meter hypothesis is involved in Rossi's device, then one would 
need to show nanometer particulate. Rossi says many times that his nickel is 10 
micron obtained from http://www.gerlimetalli.it/inglese/ihome.htm

However, it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range which Frank Z has claimed is active for Pd-D 
cold fusion.

Once again, however, the evidence seems to show that Pd-D (which may be far 
more relevant to MHz-meter) is a different reaction entirely than is Ni-H. The 
two cannot easily be rationalized as being the part of a single modus operandi.

Jones







RE: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread Jones Beene
Thorium has been a pipe dream for 50 years. Back then, they also envisioned
Cars powered by Uranium. The two are so similar that the only difference is
access.

 

Thorium fission offers little significant advantage over uranium unless you
have lots of the ore - and one huge disadvantage - the natural element
contains no fissile isotope. This is fine if you have access to fissile
material from elsewhere. Otherwise, with thorium you have a heavy metal
door-stop.

 

Back about 3-4 years, Lewis Larsen  Co got into the thorium transmutation
act. Apparently there are some bacteria which can transmute thorium (as well
as Uranium) 

 

They call it fissionless but it is unclear if much energy can be derived.
The assumption is that energy can be derived, but AFAIK - they dropped the
suggestion as unrealistic. 

 

http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/thoriumseed-lenr-networkfigslattice-e
nergydec-7-2010-6177745

 

If you are looking for good bets - IMO look elsewhere than thorium for
energy - at least if you are not in Asia. 

 

They like Thorium in India and China because they have lots of the ore, and
importantly, they have the fissile material from their A bomb programs -
with which to start the reaction (it can also be derived from the waste of
uranium fission). but make no mistake, Thorium is almost completely useless
without a fissile material. and had Fukushima been thorium fueled, the
result could have been worse - not better.

 

From: Blaze 

 

 
http://www.caradvice.com.au/132921/the-thorium-powered-car-eight-grams-one-
million-miles/
http://www.caradvice.com.au/132921/the-thorium-powered-car-eight-grams-one-m
illion-miles/

 

In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:08:02 -0700
(PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
 
I found this link on the Cold Fusion Times website.
What powers the laser that heats the thorium? Is this a parody?
Harry
 
 http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/%22A
http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/A U.S. company says it is 
getting closer to putting prototype electric cars on the road that will be 
powered by the heavy-metal thorium.
Thorium is a naturally occurring, slightly radioactive rare-earth element 
discovered in 1828 by the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, who named
it 
after Thor, the Norse god of thunder. It is found in small amounts in most 
rocks and soils, where it is about three times more abundant than uranium.
 
In order to get that much energy out of thorium, you have to fission it. Now
you
could do that with fast particles directly or by first converting it to U233
then fissioning it with slow neutrons. Since a laser is employed, and we
know
that lasers can be used as particle accelerators, my guess would be that
they
intend to accelerate protons with the laser and use them to fission the
Thorium
directly.
 
Regards,
 
Robin van Spaandonk
 
 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

 



[Vo]:Is this for real or a scam?

2013-10-15 Thread Rob Dingemans

Hi,

Just wondering if anybody knows about Liberty Generator?
http://www.libertygenerator.com/
Be aware it is an endless long video with a Powerpoint kind of 
presentation with Voice-over.


Is this for real or just another scam?
Anybody knows how it works if it does work?

Kind regards,

Rob



Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread James Bowery
The recent advances in accelerator
technologyhttp://www6.slac.stanford.edu/news/2013-09-27-accelerator-on-a-chip.aspxwill
open a lot of interesting possibilities.  Controlled thorium fission
is one.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:

 http://www.caradvice.com.au/132921/the-thorium-powered-car-eight-g
 rams-one-million-miles/

 In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT):
 Hi,
 [snip]
 
 I found this link on the Cold Fusion Times website.
 What powers the laser that heats the thorium? Is this a parody?
 Harry
 
 http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/A U.S. company says it is
 getting closer to putting prototype electric cars on the road that will be
 powered by the heavy-metal thorium.
 Thorium is a naturally occurring, slightly radioactive rare-earth element
 discovered in 1828 by the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, who named it
 after Thor, the Norse god of thunder. It is found in small amounts in most
 rocks and soils, where it is about three times more abundant than uranium.

 In order to get that much energy out of thorium, you have to fission it. Now 
 you
 could do that with fast particles directly or by first converting it to U233
 then fissioning it with slow neutrons. Since a laser is employed, and we know
 that lasers can be used as particle accelerators, my guess would be that they
 intend to accelerate protons with the laser and use them to fission the 
 Thorium
 directly.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk
 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html





Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread James Bowery
You're lumping all thorium technologies together when they are radically
different from each other.  Please qualify your statements or I'll presume
you are ignorant about thorium.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

  Thorium has been a pipe dream for 50 years. Back then, they also
 envisioned Cars powered by Uranium. The two are so similar that the only
 difference is access.

 ** **

 Thorium fission offers little significant advantage over uranium unless
 you have lots of the ore - and one huge disadvantage – the natural element
 contains no fissile isotope. This is fine if you have access to fissile
 material from elsewhere. Otherwise, with thorium you have a heavy metal
 door-stop.

 ** **

 Back about 3-4 years, Lewis Larsen  Co got into the thorium transmutation
 act. Apparently there are some bacteria which can transmute thorium (as
 well as Uranium) 

 ** **

 They call it “fissionless” but it is unclear if much energy can be
 derived. The assumption is that energy can be derived, but AFAIK – they
 dropped the suggestion as unrealistic. 

 ** **


 http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/thoriumseed-lenr-networkfigslattice-energydec-7-2010-6177745
 

 ** **

 If you are looking for good bets – IMO look elsewhere than thorium for
 energy – at least if you are not in Asia. 

 ** **

 They like Thorium in India and China because they have lots of the ore,
 and importantly, they have the fissile material from their A bomb programs
 - with which to start the reaction (it can also be derived from the waste
 of uranium fission)… but make no mistake, Thorium is almost completely
 useless without a fissile material… and had Fukushima been thorium fueled,
 the result could have been worse – not better.

 ** **

 *From:* Blaze 

 ** **


 http://www.caradvice.com.au/132921/the-thorium-powered-car-eight-grams-one-million-miles/
 

 ** **

 In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:08:02 -0700 
 (PDT):

 Hi,

 [snip]

  

 I found this link on the Cold Fusion Times website.

 What powers the laser that heats the thorium? Is this a parody?

 Harry

  

 http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/A U.S. company says it is 
 

 getting closer to putting prototype electric cars on the road that will be 
 

 powered by the heavy-metal thorium.

 Thorium is a naturally occurring, slightly radioactive rare-earth element 
 

 discovered in 1828 by the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, who named it 
 

 after Thor, the Norse god of thunder. It is found in small amounts in most 
 

 rocks and soils, where it is about three times more abundant than 
 uranium.

 ** **

 In order to get that much energy out of thorium, you have to fission it. Now 
 you

 could do that with fast particles directly or by first converting it to 
 U233

 then fissioning it with slow neutrons. Since a laser is employed, and we 
 know

 that lasers can be used as particle accelerators, my guess would be that 
 they

 intend to accelerate protons with the laser and use them to fission the 
 Thorium

 directly.

 ** **

 Regards,

 ** **

 Robin van Spaandonk

 ** **

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

  ** **



Re: [Vo]:Is this for real or a scam?

2013-10-15 Thread Rob Dingemans

Jones et al,

Just for clarification I have NO whatsoever affiliation with this site.
Curious minds only wanted to know what the claimed behind laying 
principle/technique is for this generator.


Kind regards,

Rob



RE: [Vo]:Is this for real or a scam?

2013-10-15 Thread Jones Beene
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upselling

 

No electrical generator is required for this ploy to function, this is
basically a generator of income. 

 

Of course they can supply a picture of something if you want it. 

 

They take many liberties with the truth.

 

 

From: Jed Rothwell 

 

This is the worst kind of scam: the exposed scam scam.

Immediate tip-off - numerous sites set up to promote the device by first
claiming to expose that it is really a scam - but then shifting gears and
saying that in fact, the device works as claimed.

 

Whoa! That's some kind of recursive function, or a mirror-image paradox. I
don't know what it would be.

 

I guess it is the liar paradox, i.e., the assertion this statement is
false which is true if it is false, but false if it is true.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox

 

- Jed

 



[Vo]:Disruption of traditional power generation

2013-10-15 Thread Alan Fletcher
An example of what might happen when LENR takes off?

How to lose half a trillion euros
http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21587782-europes-electricity-providers-face-existential-threat-how-lose-half-trillion-euros

ON JUNE 16th something very peculiar happened in Germany’s electricity market. 
The wholesale price of electricity fell to minus (Euro) 100 per megawatt hour 
(MWh). That is, generating companies were having to pay the managers of the 
grid to take their electricity. It was a bright, breezy Sunday. Demand was low. 
Between 2pm and 3pm, solar and wind generators produced 28.9 gigawatts (GW) of 
power, more than half the total. The grid at that time could not cope with more 
than 45GW without becoming unstable.



Battery-Stored Solar Power Sparks Backlash From Utilities
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-07/battery-stored-solar-power-sparks-backlash-from-utilities.html

California’s three biggest utilities are sparring with their own customers 
about systems that store energy from the sun, opening another front in the 
battle that’s redefining the mission of electricity generators.





Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  James Bowery's message of Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:40:35 -0500:
Hi,

Yes, that may be an option. Also, AFAIK, it's possible to accelerate particles
in a plasma with a laser. Probably based on the same or similar principle.
However any such scheme doesn't appear to take into account the neutrons
released by fissioning the thorium. I suspect that the neutrons would make a
fission based power source unacceptable in car, reason why it was dropped back
in the 50's. Furthermore there is also the small matter of dealing with the
radiation from the daughter products. 

The recent advances in accelerator
technologyhttp://www6.slac.stanford.edu/news/2013-09-27-accelerator-on-a-chip.aspxwill
open a lot of interesting possibilities.  Controlled thorium fission
is one.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:

 http://www.caradvice.com.au/132921/the-thorium-powered-car-eight-g
 rams-one-million-miles/

 In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT):
 Hi,
 [snip]
 
 I found this link on the Cold Fusion Times website.
 What powers the laser that heats the thorium? Is this a parody?
 Harry
 
 http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/A U.S. company says it is
 getting closer to putting prototype electric cars on the road that will be
 powered by the heavy-metal thorium.
 Thorium is a naturally occurring, slightly radioactive rare-earth element
 discovered in 1828 by the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, who named it
 after Thor, the Norse god of thunder. It is found in small amounts in most
 rocks and soils, where it is about three times more abundant than uranium.

 In order to get that much energy out of thorium, you have to fission it. Now 
 you
 could do that with fast particles directly or by first converting it to U233
 then fissioning it with slow neutrons. Since a laser is employed, and we know
 that lasers can be used as particle accelerators, my guess would be that they
 intend to accelerate protons with the laser and use them to fission the 
 Thorium
 directly.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk
 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:Disruption of traditional power generation

2013-10-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:

An example of what might happen when LENR takes off?


Yes, only much, much worse. More like what happened to the ocean liner
trade after transatlantic air travel become popular in the 1950s. The
industry will vanish in a generation. Except perhaps in a few specialized
markets such as New York City or Tokyo.

- Jed


[Vo]:Video The Believers

2013-10-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I just saw this video for the first time:

http://thebelieversmovie.com/

It was nice to see Martin, Ed, Mike and a few others talk. However, overall
I find this video is appalling. It is 87 minutes of he-said, she-said
fact-free blather. It does not present any salient scientific fact about
cold fusion. Not one graph. Not one falsifiable statement. It features bits
and pieces of interviews with a few people who know what they are talking
about interspersed with creepy music and idiotic voice over comments.
Mostly it is about some of the events in the first few months of 1989, with
no mention of the fact that by mid-1990, ~100 major labs reported
replications.

- Jed


RE: [Vo]:how will massive oil discovery impact LENR?

2013-10-15 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
 

 

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:58 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:how will massive oil discovery impact LENR?

 

I always have mixed feelings about things like this. On one hand I hate to
see people having to pay so much for gasoline. 

 

Another way to look at Paying so much is that in the 50's, a US silver
quarter would buy a gallon of gasoline.  Today a pre 1964 US quarter will

buy about a gallon and a half, so the real price has declined.  You can't
measure things with a super elastic yardstick!

 

 

On the other hand, without price pressure there is no incentive to develop
alternative fuels, better batteries or even cold fusion.

 

- Jed

 



Re: [Vo]:how will massive oil discovery impact LENR?

2013-10-15 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
I'd be more worried about the impact of something like this on the
environment.


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Roarty, Francis X 
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:

  Massive oil discovery in Southern Australia could dwarf OPEC..  

 ** **

 http://moneymorning.com/ob-article/arckaringa-saudi.php?code=131883

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **



Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  mix...@bigpond.com's message of Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:36:54 +1100:
Hi,

My notion of how it might work:-

The fast particles from the thorium fission process could excite a gas causing
it to lase. The laser light would then accelerate protons in the same gas which
would fission more thorium. 
This would be entirely self contained, and self powering.

Of course you would need to be able to turn the laser on and off at will.

BTW, 8 gm of Thorium would provide either 25 kW for 7200 hours or 250 kW for 720
hours, assuming 100% conversion efficiency.

[snip]
In reply to  James Bowery's message of Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:40:35 -0500:
Hi,

Yes, that may be an option. Also, AFAIK, it's possible to accelerate particles
in a plasma with a laser. Probably based on the same or similar principle.
However any such scheme doesn't appear to take into account the neutrons
released by fissioning the thorium. I suspect that the neutrons would make a
fission based power source unacceptable in car, reason why it was dropped back
in the 50's. Furthermore there is also the small matter of dealing with the
radiation from the daughter products. 
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:how will massive oil discovery impact LENR?

2013-10-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:

I'd be more worried about the impact of something like this on the
 environment.


Naturally. That's one if big reasons we want cold fusion.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:New DoE Head= Professor Ernest Moniz- MIT

2013-10-15 Thread James Bowery

 Now that former Physics Dept. Head Professor Ernest Moniz is a Deputy U.S.
 Secretary of Energy, MIT’s ability to bring influence to bear for hot
 fusion will be even stronger.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2776421/posts


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:

 Greetings Vortex,

 Just appointed Professor Moniz of MIT Green Energy Initiative:
 http://esd.mit.edu/Faculty_Pages/moniz/moniz.htm

 MIT Day...Dr Swartz and Hagelstien...should have been considered=  grins.

 Ron Kita
 Doylestown PA



Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

The fast particles from the thorium fission process could excite a gas
 causing
 it to lase. The laser light would then accelerate protons in the same gas
 which
 would fission more thorium.


If the protons are within the lasing medium, how does it accelerate them in
a specific direction?

Eric


Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  Eric Walker's message of Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:43:02 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

The fast particles from the thorium fission process could excite a gas
 causing
 it to lase. The laser light would then accelerate protons in the same gas
 which
 would fission more thorium.


If the protons are within the lasing medium, how does it accelerate them in
a specific direction?

Eric

The gas is contained within a cavity that is dimensioned and tuned to the laser
light wavelength, just like an ordinary gas laser. AFAIK the protons are
accelerated along the axis of the laser.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:U.S. Researcher Preparing Prototype Cars Powered by Heavy-Metal Thorium

2013-10-15 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

The gas is contained within a cavity that is dimensioned and tuned to the
 laser
 light wavelength, just like an ordinary gas laser. AFAIK the protons are
 accelerated along the axis of the laser.


My thought was that the light would go back and forth within the cavity,
resulting in a net force of zero on the protons.  In that case, would it
only be once the light emerges from an opening on one side of the cavity
and exited that a positive force could be exerted on a body?

Eric