From: Mark Iverson (about 9 months ago): This story might tie in to what
Jones has been saying in a number of vortex postings. Is the radius of a
proton wrong?
http://phys.org/news/2013-02-textbook-radius-proton-wrong.html
In answering Mark, back then, a little more detail was added to the
FWIW: Analysis of proton mass using Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal system:
http://reciprocalsystem.org/PDFa/Subatomic%20Mass%20Recalculated%20(Peret,%2
0Bruce).pdf
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/secondary.htm
_
From: Jones Beene
Andrea Rossi
December 26th, 2013 at 8:41
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=833cpage=3#comment-890157
Steven N. Karels:
Your comment has been erroneously spammed ( my fault, I am very tired and
stressed, and I pushed the wrong botton) but here are the answers to your
questions, which
Cold Fusion Now took video of Kidwell's presentation at ICF-18, but we
did not get permission to upload publicly. He did not want his picture
taken at all. I complied with his wishes.
After his talk, Iwamura, and others, vociferously answered Kidwell's
claims, and stood by their results.
At this point there needs to be a detailed account of what Kidwell mean't
by lucky tweezers.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
Cold Fusion Now took video of Kidwell's presentation at ICF-18, but we did
not get permission to upload publicly. He did not want his
Pardon if this was already posted, but did the presentation include more
details than revealed in his recent patent application below?
Excess enthalpy upon pressurization of dispersed palladium with hydrogen
or deuterium - US 20130316897 A1
Abstract
Disclosed herein is a method for producing
This is pretty good.
I think item 1 refers to the long duration ELFORSK test. I asked Rossi to
confirm this.
- Jed
What is the time one might expect for the necessary safety certifications
of domestic appliances? It has been 2 years since the October, 2011 1MW
demonstration which ganged up a bunch of appliance-scale devices.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:59 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the time one might expect for the necessary safety certifications
of domestic appliances? It has been 2 years since the October, 2011 1MW
demonstration which ganged up a bunch of appliance-scale devices.
That was in Italy. I believe he means
I wrote:
I think the approvals are only for industrial users, not for home use. I
believe safety standards for consumer-level appliances are more demanding
than for industry. . . In industry you assume that trained experts will
operate the equipment.
That is what Rossi said in the
Right my question was specifically about consumer-level appliances of
course.
So paraphrasing your answer to my question:
If the certifying institution (say UL) is aware that they are dealing
with a nuclear device, 2 years would be lightning fast. Even if they
treated it as an ordinary water
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:28:54 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This sounds a little like a rogue wave phenomenon [1]; Jones mentioned
something similar sometime back [2]. I'm personally guessing the planets
in the simulation are being ejected because of a gradual floating point
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
So paraphrasing your answer to my question:
If the certifying institution (say UL) is aware that they are dealing
with a nuclear device, 2 years would be lightning fast. Even if they
treated it as an ordinary water boiler (operating around 100C as
I learned how to write books in order to bypass journal editors. Now, with
this knowledge, I am writing books in other fields. I hope to sell a few.
The introduction to my next book, of course, it is technical.
Do you already know how to build client side HTML webpages? You have never
NASA Glenn develops automated flywheel pulse-and-glide system; improving
fuel economy up to 40-100%
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/12/20131227-glenn.html
I wonder how the oil industry will try to undercut this technology?
New presentation on past reports of transmutations
Lattice Energy LLC - Mystery of Nagaokas 1920s Gold Experiments
- Why Did Work Stop by 1930 - Dec 27 2013
The discussion by Rossi of powering the device for 1/4 of the time during which
the COP is greater than 1 and then letting it run in a self sustaining mode for
the other 3/4 of the time is fairly consistent with my heat controlled model.
He has maintained this position for a couple of years
17 matches
Mail list logo
