Hi,
I start to make a quick analysis of the Lugano test result.
There is probably big errors, since my approach is bachelor level (not my
job).
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/959-IR-Cam-brochure/?postID=2001#post2001
From the manufacturer documentation it appears that IR cam
Eric--
You have indicated that the space where pair production occurs is not empty.
You indicate the space must have an electromagnetic field which interacts with
an incoming photon.
We have assumed different conditions necessary for pair production. You may be
correct that empty space
Dear Friends,
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/11/a-new-analogy-for-lenr.html
It is a product of my autumn of discontent. The winter will be probably
much better and the spring excellent.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
The thread below found on a 2007 forum thread
http://lofi.forum.physorg.com/Speed--Of-Light-Depends-On-Vacuum-Permittivity-_16713.html
makes reference to a paper http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html
THE VACUUM, LIGHT SPEED, AND THE REDSHIFT. The takeaway is clear that C is
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:44:46 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
If the particles appear and then annihilate each other so that nothing is left
then they would not carry away any momentum or energy. Normal drives require
that an amount of momentum that equals that which is
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:06:09 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I agree Axil. And those particles that are produced are then given the
momentum required to balance out that obtained by the ship. Also, they must
remain in existence as real particles and not disappear after
One issue that tends to support the thought that the internal energy can vanish
without a visible trace is that the man onboard the ship can detect that he is
undergoing acceleration while the drive is active. If it is eventually
confirmed that a force arises from the activation of the drive
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:08:27 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Bob, consider the following sequence of maneuvers taken by the spaceship and
the guy within. First, he decided to move in one direction for an extended
length of time. Then he decides to return to his starting
Here I have to disagree. It makes more sense to assume that he looses energy
during both accelerations. If that energy goes into the zpe field then it will
just vanish as far as any observer can determine. The guy on the ship is
satisfied that he used up some of the mass of his vehicle to
I agree with most of your statements, Peter. Although I am a born optimism
so I could word it differently:)
In this particular regard it is hard to be an optimist.
In another tread it has been discussed how to better sell the idea of LENR.
All parties hope for a shortcut - but there is none.
The
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:43:00 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Here I have to disagree. It makes more sense to assume that he looses energy
during both accelerations. If that energy goes into the zpe field then it
will just vanish as far as any observer can determine.
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space/#.VHZ-ZZPF_U4
Cool.
Francis:
It sounds like the theory is pushing that C (speed of light) is not a
constant. I have been saying such a thing for about a decade now. Here's
an example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2270920/posts
Even better
Fran,
The important paper in this fine write-up is from Barton in 1990 -
Faster-than-c light between parallel mirrors . the Scharnhorst effect
rederived. Definitely an oldie but goody. it is the essence of the entire
piece.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939091224Y
(Ross) Michael Carrell died on Sunday November 23rd. Mike died peacefully
in his bed at the extended care facility of Medford Leas.
Condolences, candle lightings, and thoughts are most welcome at
http://www.bradleystow.com/notices/R-Carrell/guest-book.
-
R. MICHAEL CARRELL of Medford,
It would be refreshing to find that the energy is returned, but I harbor no
expectation of that occurring. Consider that what we consider acceleration is
exactly the same as deceleration as far as a ship is concerned. In either
situation the ship is changing velocity as a function of time
Oh my goodness. It is Kurt Vonnegut's *chrono-synclastic infundibulum*.
No wonder Bill Gates has taken such a sudden interest...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sirens_of_Titan
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
