I agree with most of your statements, Peter. Although I am a born optimism so I could word it differently:) In this particular regard it is hard to be an optimist. In another tread it has been discussed how to better sell the idea of LENR. All parties hope for a shortcut - but there is none. The management problem you compare to has the same dilemma and everybody think that it must exist a shortcut. It does not. I am not so sure those seven laws covers it all, but I am sure that more than 80% (Pareto) and that is good enough. The problem is of course that all the laws needs to be attended all the time. That requires the ordinary virtues; hard work , tenacity, integrity, knowledge, leadership, openness etc. etc. Often do we hope for luck, theft, or other shortcuts. They do not work. I can hear a constant analysis of what is wise to tell and how patents are made a little wrong because otherwise someone will steal the idea. Reality is that the idea cannot be stolen from a successful enterprise. I know I will hear opposition for saying so, but reality is what you so clearly explained. All ingredients need to be at hand to get success. The information in the patent is only good for someone who has all the other component. I would say that in regards to LENR nobody has all the other components. Unfortunately we do not exchange much info to correct the situation.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I have just published: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/11/a-new-analogy-for-lenr.html > > It is a product of my autumn of discontent. The winter will be probably > much better and the spring excellent. > > Peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
