http://hho4free.com/documents/patent_screening_uspto%20memo.pdf
It goes without saying that anything Rossi has done is likely flagged..
Just so my answer is not mistaken, let me say that the MFMP replica will be
exactly the same size as the Lugano hotCat. It will have convection fins
on the outside of the convection tube just like the Lugano hotCat.
Ryan Hunt of HUG has made excellent progress in casting the convection
surface
Bob,
I think we are witnessing a rather significant string of linked assumptions
that is confused at best, and most likely locally false. He is a counterpoint.
1) We know from this report that the insert shown will already reach the
limit of temperature sustainability for Kanthal
EM Inductance from a coil activating the hot stuff?
On Monday, December 8, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Bob,
I think we are witnessing a rather significant string of linked
assumptions that is confused at best, and most likely locally false. He is
a counterpoint.
1)
Maybe a reason why Piantelly has gone the European Patent Office route.
(and getting a grant meanwhile)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://hho4free.com/documents/patent_screening_uspto%20memo.pdf
It goes without saying that anything Rossi
Jones, I think you are wrong about most of these points. The proof will
be in the experiment when it is conducted.
1) We know from this report that the insert shown will already reach
the limit of temperature sustainability for Kanthal wire at about 800
watts. To go higher will demand
Dear Friend,
The 6 Pillars continue to generate ideas; I found
some info I like, see:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/daily-shared-lenr-discoveries-december_8.html
Please let me know what have I omitted, thanks!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Bob--
The MFMP test as you describe seems to me to be well thought out, and your
evaluation of the Lugano test probably correct. I also think Jones is jumping
to conclusions. We will see with the results of the MFMP testing. I hope your
estimates about the lifetime of the electrical wires
The main heater coil will be completely encased in alumina to keep away the
air (O2). It looks like we will insert the inner coil inside the alumina
heater tube and then will use alumina cement to close off the ends from
air, so the only air that it is exposed to is that which is in the volume
From: Bob Higgins
* We will probably be able to add only up to 1kW in this coil. It is
supplementary to the main heater coil which will be around this one. We
believe the main Kanthal coil can supply 2.4kW. The total electrical heater
input for the experiment can get to the 3.4kW
Right. If we use an identically calibrated Optris camera as the Lugano
team used and duplicate their infrared measured image using much less input
power than was claimed as output, the MFMP dummy test will have provided
negative confirmation of the Lugano results.
HOWEVER ... I just received
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another interesting prospect is that the LENR heat from the small reaction
core could have been better distributed throughout the hotCat mass if the
heat was transported by low energy photons (soft x-ray), which would
From: Bob Higgins
* Right. If we use an identically calibrated Optris camera as the Lugano
team used and duplicate their infrared measured image using much less input
power than was claimed as output, the MFMP dummy test will have provided
negative confirmation of the Lugano results.
The method of catalytic action in the Rossi reactor may be opposite to what
Rossi has stated. The catalytic environment could be created by the nickel
micro-particles rather than the secret sauce. The secret sauce could be
the fuel of the reaction such that the nickel particles remain relativity
Several people have questioned Mr. Rossi on his journal about the SSM
operations and how they are defined. He eventually answered that he
considered both PWM and zero input drive after warm up as being forms of SSM.
The first is when the input power is operated at a certain low duty cycle.
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Levi for sure is dummy # 1 for allowing Rossi to take complete control
over a so-called “independent” experiment.
Why do you say this was complete control? Rossi and all of the people who
did the experiment say that he had no control. He did not select
A while back I said that the nucleon's displacement was 1.36 Fermi's. Many
argued the radius of the proton was .86 Fermi's and my model was wrong. I
stuck by my model and now I know why it was correct. ref the link below.
http://applet-magic.com/He4nuclide.htm
Frank Znidarsic
17 matches
Mail list logo
