The patent office issued a final rejection of Rossi's patent
application.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-Patent
I'm not surprised ... he didn't reveal anything of the internal
structure or catalysts, and recently added the Legano report as
evidence.
I
Dear Friends,
It is fine to see how the flow of positive information is increasing again-
for our field: But we still need more pragmatic realism, therefore please
read this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/lenr-lenr-and-duhanovs-axioms.html
Very truly yours,
Peter
-
Dr. Peter Gluck
Be careful not to read too much into the USPTO's stamp of final
rejection. It is not uncommon to receive this notice during the process
of patent prosecution. I have issued patents, which, during the course of
prosecution, got stamped final rejection. It is time for the patent
attorneys to do
My reading of the rejection was that LENR was impossible because of the
Coulomb barrier.
It is not clear to me that Rossi's patent as it stands is of much use.
He leaves out the critical bits about what makes it work at low
temperature and with the COP he claims. You might argue that he was
CB Sites,
Yes, nitinol does not hold up well to hydrogen loading. I did several
electrolysis experiments with it in 2012/2013 with H. Thicker wire held up
better.
You can see a video of one of the experiments here:
I don't believe that nickel or titanium can be loaded with hydrogen. Is
such loading even possible?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:02 PM, CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting video and reference Jack. I did one LENR experiment with
Nitjnol that may be worth repeating. My system didn't
Axil, unless there is some limit on loading your talking about, both Nickel
and titanium will load hydrogen/deuterium into their lattice. Titanium
was what Steve Jones first used in his first CF experiments because it
would load more deuterium than palladium greater than one I believe. .
Nickel
This is all happening according to how I predicted:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98213.html
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The patent office issued a final rejection of Rossi's patent
application.
What's the old saying; great minds think alike. I loved the video. You
could see pulses of bubbles being ejected from the nitinol as it
contracted. In my rig, I had the nitinol vertical and when it would
contract it would pull the lever arm of a weighted fulcrum up, I was later
going to use
Interesting video and reference Jack. I did one LENR experiment with
Nitjnol that may be worth repeating. My system didn't work out to well but
I only tried once. The idea was to use electrolysis to load the Nitenol
wth D+ and then heat the nitinol to contract forcing the lattice deuterium
to
Unless u really worked hard.. then release it as a Master Beta :_)
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:35 PM
To: John Milstone
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Addendum to Murphy's Law
Release it as a beta.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Hi,
The last 1% always takes 99 times more effort than the first 99%.
Murphy's Law Addendum for LENR. The success rate of an experiment (when the
inventor is present) is inversely proportional to the replication rate, but
only when it exceed
Marketing Corollary to Addendum to Murphy's Law:
That's not a bug, it's a feature.
AlanG
On 3/12/2015 7:32 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi,
The last 1% always takes 99 times more effort than the first 99%.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
13 matches
Mail list logo
