What's the old saying; great minds think alike.  I loved the video.  You
could see pulses of bubbles being ejected from the nitinol as it
contracted.   In my rig, I had the nitinol vertical and when it would
contract it would pull the lever arm of a weighted fulcrum up,  I was later
going to use to try to calculate the force.  I burned through just about
every filament I had.  It was a good lesson in hydrogen embrittlement.
 It's still  not a bad idea, but we just need a material that doesn't get
brittle after hydrogen or deuterium loading.   I'm clueless as to what that
would be.


On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote:

> CB Sites,
>
> Yes, nitinol does not hold up well to hydrogen loading.  I did several
> electrolysis experiments with it in 2012/2013 with H.  Thicker wire held up
> better.
>
> You can see a video of one of the experiments here:
>
>
> http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2013/01/23/automated-android-electrolysis-system-nitinol-demonstration/
>
> I was trying to do the same thing (load hydrogen and induce contraction).
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:02 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Interesting video and reference Jack.  I did one LENR experiment with
>> Nitjnol that may be worth repeating.  My system didn't work out to well but
>> I only tried once.  The idea was to use electrolysis to load the Nitenol
>> wth D+ and then heat the nitinol to contract forcing the lattice deuterium
>> to fuse.  It looks like it gets brittle but I was using a very very small
>> sample.  I wonder if it would work with a larger sample, or perhaps another
>> type of shape memory metal.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Another way that shape memory materials might be used in a LENR reactor
>>> is to form Micro particles out of high temperature shape memory material
>>> such as Ti–50(Pt,Ir) or Nitinol (50Ni 50Ti).
>>>
>>> At reactor temperatures lower than the operating temperature setpoint,
>>> the shape memory micro particle would be shape set to be covered with LENR
>>> activating nanostructure like tubercles. But when the temperature increased
>>> beyond that setpoint temperature, the topology of the micro-particle would
>>> change so that the tubercles would recede and then disappear.
>>>
>>> As the LENR reaction lost strength as a reaction to the removal via
>>> shape memory adjustment of the tubercle structures from the surface of  the
>>> micro-particles, the operating temperature of the reactor would naturally
>>> drop below the operational temperature set-point, the tubercles would
>>> reappear once again as the shape memory surface of the micro-particles
>>> would recover its original shape.
>>>
>>> In response to the lower temperature and the resultant reappearance of
>>> the tubercle surface, the Ni/H LENR reactor would once again increase in
>>> temperature due to reappearance of the tubercles on the surface of the
>>> micro-particles.
>>>
>>> In this simple an uncomlicated way under analog control, the Ni/H
>>> reactor would automatically maintain in a failsafe and totally reliable
>>> manor a constant thermostatically controlled operating temperature.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to