In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:56:04 -0400:
Hi,
If all the fission energy in 20 lb. of Pu239 were released it would be over
175000 tons of TNT.
If the bomb only yields 20 tons it is incredibly inefficient. I would expect
more like 2 tons.
>H LV wrote:
>
>The
If a quantum bomb could store energy in an entangled state, it would
explode by de-entanglement rather than by a chain reaction.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material can
> support a chain reaction. The
Neutral muons may act like neutrons and be absorbed to cause a reaction with
additional neutral muons and/or charged muons.
A local source of charged muons, which are known to induce D fusion and maybe H
fusion to D.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday,
Brian—
I am beginning to consider that all nuclear forces are electromagnetic and that
the pairing of electrons with electrons and positrons with positrons at a
dimension associated with the Planck scale (10 E-34 meters) is involved in
nucleon bonding. Electrons are assumed to be closely
Jones—
I partially concur, particularly the spin part and the suggested experiments
However there is a lot of evidence for He-4 and Pd electrodes from the get go.
The CR-37 He-4 detection is pretty good in my mind.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday,
H LV wrote:
The smallest nuke was the Davy Crockett weighing 76 lbs with an explosive
> yield of 20 Tons of TNT.
>
That's small! The critical mass of Pu is around 20 lb. 56 lbs of other
hardware.
What an idiotic weapon.
The smallest nuke was the Davy Crockett weighing 76 lbs with an explosive
yield of 20 Tons of TNT.
Compare with the 'conventional' MOAB bomb weighing 18,500 lbs with an
explosive of yield of 11 Tons of TNT.
The Davey Crockett was also more lethal due to the radiation it gave off.
7 matches
Mail list logo
