Re: [Vo]:For Safety Reasons Drive Always Required in SSM
defkalion is more clear about that, and it look similar. they drive the chamber with plasma excitation for few time, then for few minute the reactor is not excited (told SSM for e-cat) When getting cooler, it is excited again. Cycle looks the same for E-catand Hyperion, but E-cat is just slower, and excitation is just heat , not spark. 2012/10/21 David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com Rossi has been asked another time about drive during the self sustaining mode and confirmed that it is required for safety reasons. Check this question and answer. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365011and http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365064. With this response there can be little doubt that what he refers to as SSM is really a duty cycle input drive waveform as I have suggested on many occasions. In his journal, he points out that the Hot Cat SSM periods are typically 1 hour. My interpretation is that the drive lasts for about 1 hour and then the device drifts for another 1 hour. I admit that he is elusive in explaining the actual operation of the device. Also, Rossi continues to quote a COP of 6 for his product. Read this link: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365306. This is for the Hot Cat contracts even with the latest reported data. I do not consider this a problem at this point since it makes sense according to my simulations. Of course I would like to see evidence of a larger COP, but with the high temperatures now being produced it is obvious to me that he should be able to connect his device to a generator of some type and have sufficient electrical power available for the drive and plenty left over. At one time gas heating was suggested by him, but that appears to be left out of his postings now. I am not sure why this is so. Dave
Re: [Vo]:For Safety Reasons Drive Always Required in SSM
Lads and Lassies, From Rossi: 1. Jaroslaw Bem http://www.ecat-polska.pl October 20th, 2012 at 7:04 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365626 To all but especially to Markus K. Markus K. wrote October 15th, 2012 at 3:45 PM: “I was thinking about your control principle with heating resistors and i don’t understand how the system can work: Because every stable control system needs a negative feedback loop. But from what i know about your Ecat, there is a positive feedback loop: if the reaction in the core begins to heat, the temperature rises and as the temp rises the reaction increases. There is no negative feedback that would reduce temperature if it goes above the target temperature, because you have no cooling, only heating resistors.” The negative feedback loop is not need to drive ECAT. For the safety reason is enough to set the hard conditions of the charge chamber ( volume, shape, masses of reactants, area of surface of Nickel powder etc. ) in such way, to slow fade out reaction. Positive feedback loop is needed only for initialize reaction and to heat reactants from time to time, to the target temperature. The lack of positive feedback loop drive, fade out reaction to stop in one hour. For example black out is not dangerous for ECAT, because reaction without the drive, slowly fade out to stop. It is only my opinion, but real facts are Dr Rossi’s secret. Best regards Jaroslaw Bem 2. Prof. Azimuth October 20th, 2012 at 8:30 AM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365212 @Ing. Rossi For safety reasons we always need the drive. How can you drive hotcat? Putting electric power to the internal resistors? Hot regards Prof. Azimuth 3. Andrea Rossi October 20th, 2012 at 11:01 AM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365304 Dear Prof. Azimuth: This is confidential. Warm Regards, A.R. 4. :-) Chan
[Vo]:For Safety Reasons Drive Always Required in SSM
Rossi has been asked another time about drive during the self sustaining mode and confirmed that it is required for safety reasons. Check this question and answer. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365011 and http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365064. With this response there can be little doubt that what he refers to as SSM is really a duty cycle input drive waveform as I have suggested on many occasions. In his journal, he points out that the Hot Cat SSM periods are typically 1 hour. My interpretation is that the drive lasts for about 1 hour and then the device drifts for another 1 hour. I admit that he is elusive in explaining the actual operation of the device. Also, Rossi continues to quote a COP of 6 for his product. Read this link: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=748cpage=3#comment-365306. This is for the Hot Cat contracts even with the latest reported data. I do not consider this a problem at this point since it makes sense according to my simulations. Of course I would like to see evidence of a larger COP, but with the high temperatures now being produced it is obvious to me that he should be able to connect his device to a generator of some type and have sufficient electrical power available for the drive and plenty left over. At one time gas heating was suggested by him, but that appears to be left out of his postings now. I am not sure why this is so. Dave
