Terry sez:
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
I have been unable to reach the website. Tried from two different
locations and at different times. Both failed
DId Park forget to pay the rent???
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry sez:
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
I have been unable to
Terry sez:
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
Yup! That was the problem.
I find Park's rants on political machinations much more appealing. I
suspect he should know.
Incidentally, I noticed that when Carl Sagan became acutely aware of
his own approaching
I agree with that statement.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:06 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry sez:
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
Yup! That was the problem.
I find Park's rants on political machinations much more
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:06 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, I noticed that when Carl Sagan became acutely aware of
his own approaching mortality, it seemed to me that his willingness to
speculate on topics previously considered taboo became much
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. You know what they say, There are no atheists in the foxhole.
See:
Military Association of Atheists
Atheists in Foxholes, in Cockpits, and on Ships
http://militaryatheists.org/atheists-in-foxholes/
- Jed
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Military Association of Atheists
Atheists in Foxholes, in Cockpits, and on Ships
http://militaryatheists.org/atheists-in-foxholes/
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement. It was
From Terry:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement. It was meant to express a general willingness to
be open toward the end.
I second that.
I have an anecdotal story regarding someone I knew who once
encountered Sagan in a casual setting. A group of
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement.
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy. What can I say?
- Jed
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement.
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy.
And we love you for being who you are!
Jed sed:
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy.
Yeah, we kind'a know that about you Jed!
No offense taken.
As for Sagan, I think he got the last laugh - posthumously. I think he
got even with his superiors when he wrote his speculative novel
Contact. If one reads the novel it's pretty obvious that
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
My(another nemesis)! How the great (tree limbs) have fallen.
12 matches
Mail list logo