In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:04:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:08 AM, wrote:
>
>> All of which means that for any given catalyst there is also an ideal
>> operating
>> temperature (where the number of molecules with the correct kinetic energy
>> i
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:03:11 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
>> I have a third ionization energy of 43.6 eV which gives:-
>
>Where did this value turn up?
In a periodic table program that I have called, not surprisingly, "Periodic
Table" from SMI corp.
(However web
can surpass
combustion and enter an endless reversible reaction fueled by changes in
Casimir geometry.
Fran
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:03 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Best
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:08 AM, wrote:
> All of which means that for any given catalyst there is also an ideal
> operating
> temperature (where the number of molecules with the correct kinetic energy is
> at
> a maximum).
So, given the ideal ops temp, the ideal hole becomes evident?
Somewher
Robin,
> I have a third ionization energy of 43.6 eV which gives:-
Where did this value turn up?
I was using an old version of Mills' CQM (hardback) but pasting from two
different sources in the original post, so I think your value could be
correct. At least it is a better fit when one enters t
Robin said,
"All of which means that for any given catalyst there is also an ideal
operating temperature (where the number of molecules with the correct
kinetic energy is at a maximum)."
I can reduce all those words down to one... "Alchemy"!
:-)
And the 'ideal operating temperature' being a trade
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:39:52 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Potassium is perhaps the most mentioned candidate in the papers, but the
>first two IP electrons are at 4.34 and 31.63 eV. What this means
>essentially is that the hole only appears when the K(2+) ion takes back the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:11:24 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Correction.
>
>Value for strontium is wrong. Thanks Rob.
>
>Looks like Moly is the best.
The best fit has to be Hydrogen itself, which is exact. However that said, it
should in reality depend on the temperature, bec
simir boundaries.
Regards
Fran
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Best Catalytic Fit?
Correction.
Value for strontium is wrong. Thanks Rob.
Lo
Correction.
Value for strontium is wrong. Thanks Rob.
Looks like Moly is the best.
I am wondering about how Mills would account for alloys. If the two elements
can average their IP somehow, then it might be possible to nail the value
closely.
Variance
Recently, an experimenter asked for the identity of the best "fit" in the
periodic table for the catalytic "energy hole" at 2Ry = 27.2 eV based on
CQM theory. I dug up an unanswered post from the HSG days. It may need
revision.
Anyone who reads the BLP experiments can recite the 'usual suspects'
11 matches
Mail list logo
