Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-03-01 Thread Jarold McWilliams
-- From: "Jarold McWilliams" > To: > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) > > > It depends on what he loses it for. Why do milliionaires give a million > dollars to charities?

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-03-01 Thread Randy Wuller
- Original Message - From: "Jarold McWilliams" To: Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) It depends on what he loses it for. Why do milliionaires give a million dollars to charities? It would be a mu

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-03-01 Thread Jarold McWilliams
It depends on what he loses it for. Why do milliionaires give a million dollars to charities? It would be a much better use of money to spend it on proving cold fusion is real. I think Dick Smith's offer is genuine, and he won't try to back out of paying the million dollars if it is proven.

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-03-01 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jarold McWilliams wrote: > If cold fusion is real, Dick Smith immediately makes millions of dollars, so > I don't think he would care much about losing a million. It's been my experience that people with millions of dollars do care about losing a million dollars.

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-03-01 Thread Jarold McWilliams
gt;> mainstream media, and their own website, NOT DGT’s website. Thus, the >>> closing down of the DGT forum will not make any difference as to whether >>> data is publicly released… >>> >>> -Mark >>> >>> From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:dan

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Jouni Valkonen
ream media, and >> their own website, NOT DGT’s website. Thus, the closing down of the DGT >> forum will not make any difference as to whether data is publicly released… >> >> -Mark >> >> From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesd

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Jarold McWilliams
Whatever. Defkalion and Rossi themselves said they would have independent verification by the end of March. On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > You are in such a hurry. I will wait until Oct30th. I chose this date last > year, for a 3rd party confirmation of a working product, b

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
You are in such a hurry. I will wait until Oct30th. I chose this date last year, for a 3rd party confirmation of a working product, because it is close to AR`s 1MW test. I will apply the same date to DGT. 2012/3/1 Jarold McWilliams > DGT may not owe us anything, but I don't owe them anything eit

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Jarold McWilliams
ublicly released… > > -Mark > > From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 2:07 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) > > Do not expect to see an

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Jarold McWilliams
DGT may not owe us anything, but I don't owe them anything either. Defkalion has shown us nothing, and Rossi just had some demos that he was in complete control of. I don't owe them any patience, though I will still wait until March 31. If nothing happens by then, there is no reason for me to

RE: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
o.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) Do not expect to see any data from these tests: "Until Defkalion Green Technologies has its product, we shall no longer get involved in the games and blogs of online media. Our next announcement in th

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Eric Walker
Hi Guenter -- your reply-to address is your own email address. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: DGT did not make a substantial error up to now. > Btw, my own projects often have delays and complications and > modifications. That's the way it is. > > In a situation like

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Craig Brown An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 0:42 Donnerstag, 1.März 2012 Betreff: RE: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) >...if they did that would be a bad move. Ofcourse. But remember.: If somebody said, that

RE: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Craig Brown
move. Original Message Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) From: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, March 01, 2012 8:07 am To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Do not expect to see any data from these tests:"Until Defkalion G

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Daniel Rocha An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 23:07 Mittwoch, 29.Februar 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) Do not expect to see any data from these tests: "Until Defkalion Green Technologi

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
hat the final test is scheduled > for > >>>> late March. He did not know when or if the test results will be > published. / > >>>> End update /. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Jouni Valkonen
he test results will be published. >>>> / >>>> End update /. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyhe

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Harry Veeder
p;tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3419329.ece >>> >>> >>> From: alain.sep...@gmail.com >>> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 20

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3419329.ece >>> >>> -- >>> From: alain.sep...@gma

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Gluck
>> http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3419329.ece >> >> ------ >> From: alai

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
-- > From: alain.sep...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:59:44 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1272&p=6889#p6889 &g

RE: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Robert Leguillon
%2Farticle3419329.ece From: alain.sep...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:59:44 +0100 Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik) To: vortex-l@eskimo.com http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1272&p=6889#p6889 Defkalion disagree wit

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Alain Sepeda
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1272&p=6889#p6889 Defkalion disagree with that article: "Nytechnik article is 100% wrong based on pure speculations of the journalist. We expect his response after a direct communication with him. DGT" 2012/2/29 Harry Veeder > Defkalion

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Daniel Rocha
I feel like banging my head against a wall. 2012/2/29 Akira Shirakawa > On 2012-02-29 02:30, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> " The test was supposed to start on Friday 24 February, but according to >> sources of Ny Teknik it was initiated only after the weekend. The >> sources also said that the test w

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-29 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2012-02-29 02:30, Daniel Rocha wrote: " The test was supposed to start on Friday 24 February, but according to sources of Ny Teknik it was initiated only after the weekend. The sources also said that the test was not focused on power or energy measurements but rather on safety." http://www.ny

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-28 Thread Harry Veeder
Defkalion failed to make it clear on their forum that the government representatives have so far only evaluated the Hyperion's safety. Surely, they realize that most people interpreted their vague annoncement of "positive results" as "positive measures of energy gain". Why do we have to learn throu

Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-28 Thread Robert
What I found most amazing, was all of the Rossi info: On February 20, 2012 Rossi performed a demonstration to show the actual level of development. Among the participants was chemist Roland Pettersson, retired Associate Professor from the University of Uppsala, who also attended a test of Rossi

[Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety (NyTeknik)

2012-02-28 Thread Daniel Rocha
" The test was supposed to start on Friday 24 February, but according to sources of Ny Teknik it was initiated only after the weekend. The sources also said that the test was not focused on power or energy measurements but rather on safety." http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/artic