Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
My impression is that NASA has done significant work with surface plasmon
effects and is absolutely convinced that they are such a breakthrough (in
other fields) that they are willing to overlook the problems as they
pertain to electrolysis LENR. . . .
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
My impression is that NASA has done significant work with
surface plasmon effects and is absolutely convinced that they are such a
breakthrough (in other fields) that they are willing to
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net presented a long list of objections to
the W-L theory:
Miracle 1 - SPPs couple with photons of light to become activated. There is
little or no light in electrolysis LENR experiments - but some light exists
in plasma glow or Mills reactions. If W-L want to
My impression is that NASA has done significant work with surface plasmon
effects and is absolutely convinced that they are such a breakthrough (in
other fields) that they are willing to overlook the problems as they pertain
to electrolysis LENR.
Separately, they believe LENR to be valid as a
4 matches
Mail list logo
