Anyone know what become of Robert L Cook? His web site has been
closed circa Dec 2007 but is available on archive.org (see
forceborne.com)? Also, I noticed in the Laithwaite patents (approved
posthumously) there is a claim of IP. Anyone know of someone pursuing
Eric's ideas?
Terry
--- Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what become of Robert L Cook? His web
site has been
closed circa Dec 2007 but is available on
archive.org (see
forceborne.com)?
Don't know much about Cook, myself.
Also, I noticed in the Laithwaite
patents (approved
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Laithwaite's trolley? Precess a mass one way, drag it
back nonprecessing the other way, slinky your way
through space. The only problem seems to be, from
reading the patent (Laithwaite Dawson) and from a
--- mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Since a = f/m, and m is constant, if there is a
force in one direction only,
then that force should accelerate the mass while it
operates. That acceleration
should increase the speed, which should then remain
constant until the next
acceleration pulse. IOW
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Since a = f/m, and m is constant, if there is a
force in one direction only,
then that force should accelerate the mass while it
operates. That acceleration
should increase the speed, which should then remain
constant until the next
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Kyle Mcallister kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Since a = f/m, and m is constant, if there is a
force in one direction only,
then that force should accelerate the mass while it
operates.
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
1. Mass M is moved say 10 units to the right by
precession, thus (supposedly) forcelessly. F=0 at
this
point.
This is a neat trick.
He he he. Let me add this: neat trick... /if it works/
If you can do this you've already shattered
7 matches
Mail list logo
