From Mr. Lawrence,
OrionWorks wrote:
Welcome back, Mr. Lawrence
Thank you, Mr. Johnson ... and I would like to make a brief OT excursion
to apologize to you for my sanctimonious, unpleasant, and undeserved
comments to you just before I flounced out of the room and slammed the
door, a
[ Ahem ... I seem to be back... ]
On 29 Jun 2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:39 -0700
Kowalski, L., S. Little, and G. Luce. Searching for excess heat in
Mizuno-type plasma electrolysis. in The 12th International Conference on
Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2005. Yokohama,
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
By the way, if anyone's actually read this far, and if you're not too
mad at me as a result of my rather sympathetic comments regarding
Little's group ...
On the contrary, I am very supportive of the fact that this community has
such a
Jones Beene wrote:
Much of this goes back to the expectancy effect, expectation-bias or
Tiller effect, which we have all commented on in the past. This is related
to other delusions that afflict even the smartest of us: the Plecebo effect,
the self-fulfilling prophecy effect, or the
Stephen -
The only insurmountable problem with an all erroneous hypothesis is
*transmutation* (and/or radioactivity). Transmutation, or an isotope
imbalance, cannot be faked, and there is no valid relic in instrumentation
or technique to account for it unless it solely in helium or hydrogen.
If
Jones, I think we need to be clear about the attitude toward CF. If a
person does not accept the basic concept that a nuclear reaction can
occur under CF conditions, either because they are totally committed
to conventional ideas or because they are just plain ignorant, no
evidence short
On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Whatever you might be expecting, I am certain that this is *not* it:
http://physicsinsights.org/iemy/
Iem so Ido. They were, and so they did.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Ed,
I understand where you are coming from, but I think that you are mistaken as
to this being a black and white issue. A substantial percentage of
physicists, many of whom provide opinions for such things as ARPA-E, have
more flexibility and open-mindedness than you are giving them discredit
Welcome back, Mr. Lawrence
...
By the way, if anyone's actually read this far, and if
you're not too mad at me as a result of my rather sympathetic
comments regarding Little's group, and if you have any
interest in something so far off topic it's beyond
off-topic, then you might be at least
Jones, this is indeed a black and white issue because success comes
from easily understood events. For example the SPAWAR results got
attention for three main reasons. The evidence is based on radiation,
which has fewer ways it can be rejected; the claimed radiation is
neutrons, which the
OrionWorks wrote:
Welcome back, Mr. Lawrence
Thank you, Mr. Johnson ... and I would like to make a brief OT excursion
to apologize to you for my sanctimonious, unpleasant, and undeserved
comments to you just before I flounced out of the room and slammed the
door, a couple of weeks back.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
You may have met him if you took a peek at the 'images'
directory under Iemy.
You really do have to be aware regarding those with whom you are
associated!
http://physicsinsights.org/iemy/felix_resilleserre.html
Black market
Kowalski, L., S. Little, and G. Luce. Searching for excess heat in
Mizuno-type plasma electrolysis. in The 12th International Conference
on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2005. Yokohama, Japan.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KowalskiLsearchingfa.pdf
This paper reports a replication of plasma
13 matches
Mail list logo
