Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-11-06 Thread Terry Blanton
More from globalresearch: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vaaid=7158 It's beginning to look a lot like treason. Terry On 10/27/07, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Apologies if folks have already seen this one -- it was new to me. I think Jones may already have

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-28 Thread Ron Wormus
John, How do you know they were actually involved or that they were killed due to their involvement? You can't just believe something because it was on the internet anymore than you can believe the official explanation. Ron --On Sunday, October 28, 2007 6:30 PM +1300 John Berry [EMAIL

[Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
[Apologies if folks have already seen this one -- it was new to me. I think Jones may already have speculated about this possibility also, but this article goes into quite a bit more detail than anything I noticed previously on Vortex.] Interesting article, with a possible explanation for

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread Jones Beene
I still have to chuckle over the six (or maybe it was five) thing... ...it's almost to the level of a comedy routine. Where are Abbott and Costello when we need them? Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: [Apologies if folks have already seen this one -- it was new to me. I think Jones may

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread R.C.Macaulay
Yep! It would be funny.. except for the serious side to the equation. It senses more like a puppet master that has three puppets strung out.. the one you are told to love, the one you are told to hate and the one you are told to ignore. In the wizard of Oz, the wizard is revealed by Toto

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
R.C.Macaulay wrote: Yep! It would be funny.. except for the serious side to the equation. It senses more like a puppet master that has three puppets strung out.. the one you are told to love, the one you are told to hate and the one you are told to ignore. In the wizard of Oz, the wizard

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread Ron Wormus
They would have to refuel before returning but I see no reason take off from Minot when the mission would likely be flown out of Robbins anyway. Also, there are plenty of Nukes available at Robbins. If the AGM's were armed, active attached to the aircraft electronics the crew would know it. If

Re: [Vo]:Loose Nukes -- in case anyone's still interested

2007-10-27 Thread John Berry
Indeed Ron. And now 6 of those involved at Barkersfield and Minot have been killed. On 10/28/07, Ron Wormus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They would have to refuel before returning but I see no reason take off from Minot when the mission would likely be flown out of Robbins anyway. Also, there are