The Proton Radius Problem and the Muon.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/researchers-orbit-a-muon-around-an-atom-confirm-physics-is-broken/
Very interesting article on Ars Technica with possible far-reaching
implications for LENR researchers.
These discrepancies from standard model predi
A force carrier that is do light should have a very long range, This I do
not understand. I can;t help that this protophobic gauge boson is really a
coherent quasiparticle of a collection or bundle of photons or the like
that has a short lifetime.
Why can it explain the muon anomalous magnetic mo
>From what I read of the paper, it's a very short range force; perhaps 12fm
but the signal seen was at 6.8 sigma, The paper is located here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.07411v1.pdf Interesting read. Where this
becomes relevant is in the electron screening that metals provide in Pd(D).
Maybe Ni(H
In answer to an offline question about testing or falsifying this 5th force
hypothesis without the expense of heavy isotopes of palladium – one option
comes to mind just now.
Remember the “bubble fusion” experiment of Rusi Taleyarkhan? He was vindicated
in his use of the very heavy element Cali
Another point to toss into the mix, CB --- the strong force operates at two
distinct geometries, which could mean that it is essentially bifurcated and
overlapping to begin with, such that one of the two can become the 5th force.
On a size-scale of a few femtometers, the strong force binds p
You people should care. This is more spectacular than cold fusion. There
are a lot of odd behavior to be expected at non linear physics. This is not
the case.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> How does your model handle conservation of angular momentum---the poor
> neglected parameter in many models focusing on energy conservation?
>
Angular momentum may be poor and neglected -- but it remains a fundamental
property of energy-matter.
Jones, I really like your idea. I instantly thought the same thing when
I read the article about the 5 force. It certainly is better than some
published theories I've read on LENR.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Bob Cook
>
>
>
> How do you explain the transfer
From: Bob Cook
How do you explain the transfer of the excess energy to the metal lattice
as heat ?
Hagelstein's theory for phonon transfer keeps improving over the years. In
his theory, the less energy which needs to be shed in the first few
downshifts, the more likely the modality bec
conservation of angular momentum---the poor
neglected parameter in many models focusing on energy conservation?
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Neuglu confirmed
To summarize a
To summarize a formative hypothesis of the modality of a 5th force boson
(labeled "neuglu") as the necessary component of Pd-D fusion, here is a
summary .
The neuglu boson would be attracted to down quarks and equally repelled by
up quarks, so that it will have net binding force for neutrons but r
This is not a confirmation. Wait for more independent tests. There might be
an error in the set up.
Another possibility. to clarify the possible relevance of neuglu in the LENR
system, for those who believe that real 4He is found in the ash is that
helium derives from a two-step process. The reaction does not produce gamma
radiation since the mass-deficit has actually been used up in the process
Jones--
I think Arnold Gulko also discusses the binding force of 2 neutrons in
U-238--see the current issue of infinite energy.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Neuglu confirmed
tidbit! By the way there is some curious isotopic data confirming the
utility of mass 110.
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Neuglu confirmed
Yesterday, it was announced than another group had
Yesterday, it was announced than another group had tentatively confirmed the
existence of a so-called fifth (or sixth) force.
https://news.uci.edu/research/uci-physicists-confirm-possible-discovery-of-f
ifth-force-of-nature/
When we discussed this discovery back in May on Vortex - following the
16 matches
Mail list logo
