From Harry Veeder
...
Today the nascent science of epigenetics is revealing how
environmental pressures can influence the genome of a
developing embryo.
There is plenty of evidence that the phenomena of
evolution is real. However, how it happened is not as
clear cut as the Neo-Darwinists
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:39 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: The Mindless crap shoot of evolution
There's a significant third player in the evolution/creationism
game, and
it's not intelligent design. Lateral gene transfer and high
complexity in
ancient lines
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
OrionWorks wrote:
All three of us, Stanford, the Cruncher and I believe that the web of
life was divinely ordered. I have previously made the case that, if
the earth sun system is viewed as a closed system, then the web of
life is
thomas malloy wrote:
OrionWorks wrote:
Thomas sez:
The Cruncher's point being that there aren't enough seconds,
throwing the dice once per second, over the past 15,000,000,000
years to have tried all the potential combinations. And that's
just for the first genome. Stanford's point is
Thomas sez:
All three of us, Stanford, the Cruncher and I believe
that the web of life was divinely ordered. I have
previously made the case that, if the earth sun system
is viewed as a closed system, then the web of life is
reversing the second law of thermodynamics. AFAIK, it
is the only
There's a significant third player in the evolution/creationism game, and
it's not intelligent design. Lateral gene transfer and high complexity in
ancient lines are probably the main clues. Here's the link, and no, it isn't
a porn site:
http://www.panspermia.com
- R.
OrionWorks wrote:
Thomas sez:
All three of us, Stanford, the Cruncher and I believe
that the web of life was divinely ordered. I have
previously made the case that, if the earth sun system
is viewed as a closed system, then the web of life is
reversing the second law of thermodynamics.
ed, would you suggest that the ability to interact with this energy world is
inherent with the existingly known mechanisms of the brain, through some
form of 4th dimensional aspect of the brain we dont understand, or through
another mechanism/organ/spirit entirely?
and, your own reality is quite
so, im curious, have you any expericence in actual nueral
chemistry/physiology, and have you done any research into where it occurs?
its where im headed, myself , after finishing my degree.
On 12/20/07, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
ed, would you suggest that
leaking pen wrote:
so, im curious, have you any expericence in actual nueral
chemistry/physiology, and have you done any research into where it
occurs? its where im headed, myself , after finishing my degree.
No, I have done no research in this area. I'm only an innocent bystander
who
OrionWorks wrote:
A recent comment from the esteemed Mr. Malloy got me to thinking...
Thomas sez:
I'm reading John Sanford's Genetic Entropy and The
Mystery of the Genome. Dr. Sanford makes the case that
most mutations are deleterious, if not fatal, to the
individual.
I actually
Howdy Richard,
...
...Our new crop of students are looking at the case presented
by both creationist and Darwinists.. they are still looking.,
but not at theory.. but girls.
Sounds to me like the laws of natural selection are being followed. ;-)
PS: Can a guy order the equivalent of a
OrionWorks wrote:
A recent comment from the esteemed Mr. Malloy got me to thinking...
Thomas sez:
I'm reading John Sanford's Genetic Entropy and The
I'm also reading Vance Ferrell's The Evolution Cruncher,
a 900 page expose on the absurdity of Evolution.
So, I thinks to
Thomas sez:
The Cruncher's point being that there aren't enough seconds,
throwing the dice once per second, over the past 15,000,000,000
years to have tried all the potential combinations. And that's
just for the first genome. Stanford's point is that the system
is deteriorating, it's
ohh, one more thing. i cant find the source at the moment, but i read a few
years back that most women will have over a dozen miscarriages in thier
lives that they wont even know about , as it never gets beyond a couple of
weeks, due to deleterious mutations and combinations.
On Dec 19, 2007
Hi All,
I recently watched Apocolypto, Mel Gibson's
takeoff on Cornell Wilde's Naked Prey.
Gibson shows Aztec ceremonies on a Mayan temple,
capped off with the arrival of a higher
civilization at the end the movie in the form
of the Spaniards -- I much prefer the ending
in Naked Prey.
Mr Smith sez:
Hi All,
I recently watched Apocolypto, Mel Gibson's
takeoff on Cornell Wilde's Naked Prey.
Gibson shows Aztec ceremonies on a Mayan temple,
capped off with the arrival of a higher
civilization at the end the movie in the form
of the Spaniards -- I much prefer the ending
in
On Dec 18, 2007 8:46 PM, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randomness is somehow perceived as a kind of
godless evil monkey wrench suspected to have been introduced by a
nefarious agent of Satin just to confuse the faithful.
Satin sheets always made me feel vil. gd r
Terry
A recent comment from the esteemed Mr. Malloy got me to thinking...
Thomas sez:
I'm reading John Sanford's Genetic Entropy and The
Mystery of the Genome. Dr. Sanford makes the case that
most mutations are deleterious, if not fatal, to the
individual. He contends that the web of life won't
Howdy Steven Johnson,
Today's university science classes avoid the Darwin theory simply because of
the lack of evidence to support it. Unless and until they find some fossil
evidence that can demonstrate a valid crossover or in-between species..
it's the stuff of library coffee shop
yup, not a single transitional fossil anywhere.
ohh... wait
whats this over here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
On Dec 18, 2007 9:37 PM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy Steven Johnson,
Today's university science classes avoid the Darwin theory
21 matches
Mail list logo
