This may be the reason why nanoplamonic experimentation is usually done
using gold. Nickel is very reactive.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
My guess is that these are the hardest to
Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan
wires during the conversations I had. This might be related.
So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you
called 'type 2')?
If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as
carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work.
If his work can actually be reproduced, that would be groundbreaking,
magnificent.
If he doesn't help others to reproduce his work, and no one can
Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.org wrote:
If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as
carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work.
That would be a patent. What you are describing is a patent. It protects
the owner's intellectual property.
I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle.
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html
I would try this particle to start off with
Get product info
https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere
Then I would ask them to make a five
Axil,
Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur.
Google nickel nanoparticles danger
- You will find references like -
Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml
Nickel Nanoparticles may
2, 2013 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Axil,
Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur.
Google nickel nanoparticles danger
- You will find references like -
Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel
I am not discussing using nano-particles. I am recommending MICRO-particles
with a nanowire coating. Yes, these can be dangerous if you breath them in.
But it is not easy to breath these big particles in. A dust mask will
protect from this danger.
5 microns is the grits size of 1000 grit sanding
: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Axil,
Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur.
Google nickel nanoparticles danger
- You will find references like -
Nickel
I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do
overrule the initial particle structures.
Since Rossi indicates that shuting down an e-cat takes a few hours,
probably due to overcooling, leaves the heated nickel in an amorfhous form.
It may even be that the nickel needs
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do
overrule the initial particle structures.
No. DGT says that there is a great increase in boron and beryllium near the
NAE. So material
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air.
- probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a
colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin.
I suspect that another problem
12 matches
Mail list logo
