RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPPJones--
One further note coming out of Peter’s comments regarding the patent of
Soininen of today is present below.
The following quote from paragraph 33 of the patent follows:
“Regarding the penetration of the Coulomb barrier around the atom nucleus,
resonance of a wave
1:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:53:18 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Let us get to the bottom of this fear. Expand...
It depends on exactly what is meant by negative energy. If meant in an
absolute
sense, then I am very doubt
within the coherent system with a
change from from spin—angular momentum—energy to kinetic (phonic) energy. It
may be that a “spinor” particle exchanges to the Dirac Sea.
Bob Cook
.
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 7:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DCE
and, hence, phonic (heat) energy and angular momentum as well
as the production (release) of individual photons.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPP
This could be the sleeper paper of the year. Photon
(heat) energy and angular
> momentum as well as the production (release) of individual photons.
>
> Bob Cook
>
> *From:* Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:02 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPP
>
&
5 matches
Mail list logo
