RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPPJones-- One further note coming out of Peter’s comments regarding the patent of Soininen of today is present below.
The following quote from paragraph 33 of the patent follows: “Regarding the penetration of the Coulomb barrier around the atom nucleus, resonance of a wave function of a particle in a quantum well system has been described by David Bohm, “Quantum theory”, Prentice-Hall, New York 1951, which is incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, a wave is reflecting back and forth across the potential in a quantum well, a wave coming in the quantum well from outside enhances the wave inside the quantum well and a strong standing wave is built up inside the quantum well when the system is in resonance. Further, the waveform of a proton tunnels through the Coulomb barrier to the nucleus of an atom with certain probability. Near a resonance the waveform intensity of the proton is considerable in the quantum well and the probability of fusing proton with the nucleus is increased. The metastable state of the fused nucleus may have such a long lifetime in solid state structures that it can decay in other ways than by re-emission of the incident proton or by emission of gamma-ray photons, and energy is released over relatively long time also as lower energy photons (e.g. X-ray photons) or as phonons (lattice vibrations) to the surrounding solid lattice.” This patent has many interesting facts and ideas new to me. However the quote noted above addresses a process for shifting potential energy of a nucleus via fusion to phonic energy of a lattice and for me is most interesting. It addresses the transition of potential energy of a coherent system to kinetic energy that I mentioned in my previous comment on this thread. Bob Cook PS: From: Jones Beene Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 7:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:DCE for SPPooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo From: Roarty, Francis X Ø Perhaps vacuum energy cannot perform measurable work at our typical physical macro velocities relative to C … Well, it is pretty clear from the literature, starting in 2011 and continuing to recent papers - that the DCE the dynamical Casimir effect - can and does function to convert virtual photons into real photons. Even if we define the photon as massless, this is “work” by most definitions even if the base-level effect may not appear like mass is being moved. This distinction is mainly semantics, since excess energy from photons has a mass-equivalent. There are dozens of DCE papers, starting here. The point is the effect is proved in experiment and theory. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/424111/first-observation-of-the-dynamical-casimir-effect/ http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4714 Beyond that, we have to extrapolate beyond a weak effect requiring a superconductor to a robust effect of the SPP in combination with DCE, requiring no superconductor (or HTSC). If SPP operates as the paper claims, to convert one real photon into two real photons (photon doubling) and DCE gives real photons from virtual photons, and the translucent ceramic stores photons, then we have set the stage of a “photon chain reaction.” Typically the term “photon chain reaction” turns up in descriptions of lasers. The glow-stick can be analogized to a semi-coherent type of IR laser where there is one predominant IR emission line and lots of secondary light which is not coherent. We could call it a superradiant laser. With any chain reaction, the output grows exponentially. Even if the incandescent light source is only 5% efficient initially (it is probably less), then net gain is still possible if there is sufficient doubling of photons due to the DCE/SPP mechanism. This MO of photon chain reaction - may sound preposterous to those who are invested in nuclear fusion as the source of gain in the glow-stick (assuming Parkhomov can be replicated)… but it is crystal clear from actual results that in fact, it is far more preposterous to suggest fusion as the main source of gain. There is little indicia of fusion whereas DCE is proved in both experiment and theory. Real fusion in a Parkhomov tube is not proved in either theory or experiment. However, transmutation of elements could be a side effect of harnessing vacuum energy even if no fusion happens. BTW – by most definitions of ZPE and its effect on electrons, especially Puthoff’s, it is clear that the Mills-effect, or fractional hydrogen, or UDD/UDH, or DDL, etc… these are ALL zero point effects - and the energy essentially comes from the same virtual photon conversion process as does DCE. Jones
