Hi Horace,
I find your posts quite interesting and you seem to have a rational rather
than emotional approach which makes for good reading.
I just read your reply to Dave and as it seemed to make the ECat (and my
kettle) impossible I thought I'd double check some of your calculations and
I think
On Oct 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, David Roberson wrote:
Hi Horace,
Thank you for the kind welcome into vortex. I suspect that my
oversized attachment tunneled through the barrier; maybe using the
same path as Rossi's device.
It must have a long de Broglie wavelength. My guess is the mass
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:50 PM, Colin Hercus wrote:
Hi Horace,
I find your posts quite interesting and you seem to have a rational
rather than emotional approach which makes for good reading.
I just read your reply to Dave and as it seemed to make the ECat
(and my kettle) impossible I
Rossi claims here, the FAT CAT has a surface of 5000 square cm and the
surface heated up to 66-80 degrees in the october demonstration:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=1#comment-93550
There was only 1 reactor active (of three) and the full 20 kW where not
reached.
Now
Focus Italia has now english translation in their video, so it is
rewarding to watch it again.
http://www.focus.it/scienza/e-cat-l-energy-catalizer-di-andrea-rossi-il-video-del-test-del-6-ottobre-2011-975_C7.aspx
The interviews are interesting.
Lewan thinks the reaction is triggered, when the
Rossi is always saying that he needs the electric power to stabilize the
reaction. Maybe it stars at 60 degrees, but needs to be hotter, or needs to
be heated for a long time, to stabilize.
Whatever he means by stabilize.
2011/10/18 Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
What I still dont
They could have two cold water inputs:
One feeds into an internal heat exchanger and then feeds the preheated
water into the reactor, and the other feeds the cold water directly into
the reactor. Then the electric energy needs should be strongly reduced
but cooling down the reactor is still
Rossi has stated that the energy released by the LENR reaction is in the form
of moderate energy gamma rays(X-Rays?) These rays are converted into heat
within the lead shielding and coolant. If this is true, heat to activate the
core could be made to exit into the coolant to slow down the
Yes, this might be true.
Of course, if they use an internal heat exchanger this would not change
the energy bilance.
But, in any case the water is pre-heated when they preheat the core.
If they would use and internal heat exchanger, then cheap E-Cat energy
would be used to preheat the water
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Rossi has stated that the energy released by the LENR reaction is
in the form of moderate energy gamma rays(X-Rays?) These rays are
converted into heat within the lead shielding and coolant. If this
is true, heat to activate the core
Hatchet Heffner hacks hence...
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Rossi has stated that the energy released by the LENR reaction is in the
form of moderate energy gamma rays(X-Rays?) These rays
Hi Horace,
Thank you for the kind welcome into vortex. I suspect that my oversized
attachment tunneled through the barrier; maybe using the same path as Rossi's
device.
You have written an interesting description of the old ECAT version and I plan
to review it thoroughly as time allows. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
