At 05:08 PM 12/19/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder mailto:hveeder...@gmail.comhveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons emissions?
If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess heat.
Incorrect. Most cold fusion
At 03:43 PM 12/19/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus:
http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/coherence%2014%20dicembre%202012%20Celani%20wire.pdf
On page 2 it says over a couple of charts:
Neutron and gamma continuous recording in ST
lab.
Karabut also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since 2005,
presented in ICCF12:
Karabut A. *Research into Energy and Temporal Characteristics of X-ray
Emission from Solid State Cathode Medium of High-Current Glow
Discharge*, *Proc.
ICCF12* (2005),
At 07:34 PM 12/19/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
I meant that if the excess heat is real and whatever the cause of the
excess heat, the excess heat might force a limited number of
transmutations and emit a small amount of gammas and neutrons.
Sure, the FPHE appears to do that, but the small
BTW, as someone pointed out, It seems other people have also detected x
rays even earlIer. Just check the paper by Ed Storms, JCMNS, nov. 2012
2012/12/20 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Karabut also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since 2005,
presented in ICCF12:
Karabut
Finding X-rays from a glow discharge (plasma, basically) is one
thing, finding them from a low-energy environment is quite another.
This is not to denigrate the research cited. It's just not relevant
to what had been mentioned, Storms finding of X-radiation *without* a
glow discharge. Yes,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
We have not found LENR effects that produce much prompt radiation, or much
of any radiation. That's quite an interesting observation, itself. There
may be something about LENR mechanisms that suppresses unstable
STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus:
http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/coherence%2014%20dicembre%202012%20Celani%20wire.pdf
On page 2 it says over a couple of charts:
Neutron and gamma continuous recording in ST
lab. No difference for spectra during experiments
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:43:39 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus:
http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/coherence%2014%20dicembre%202012%20Celani%20wire.pdf
On page 2 it says over a couple of charts:
Neutron and
In the report, STM doesn't say where the neutron and gamma are measured. If
neutron and/or gamma have low energy, they might be absorbed by the vessel
before reaching the detector. Outside the reactor is not the best place for
the detector.
Regarding the input power versus temperature, it's clear
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons
emissions?
If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess heat.
Incorrect. Most cold fusion devices that produce excess heat do not produce
measurable gamma or
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Harry Veeder's message:
Neutron and gamma continuous recording in ST
lab. No difference for spectra during experiments
showing extra heat and background
Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons
emissions?
I agree. My take on it is the sun as well as the gas giants (and other
planets) all produce the protons due to beta decay at the surface of their
dark matter nucleus. The sun's nucleus is much more massive than the
planets and thus the larger entropic gravitational
flux/radiation triggering RPF
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons
emissions?
If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess
heat.
Incorrect. Most
14 matches
Mail list logo
