Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
First, let me say, despite the casual, inaccurate, and one data point
nature of the method shown, it is far better than any calorimetry applied in
Rossi public demos.
I agree it is better for steam. It is the only reasonable way to measure a
2011/9/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I suggested that they combine this method
with other methods because this only produces one data point per test. It
only works when power is stable. So you need another method to be sure that
it is stable.
We need to hope that Brian Josephson
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, stirring is the problem. You need to stir vigorously with a stick or
something like a Dremel tool with a paint mixer attached. (Like a giant
eggbeater.)
That is untrue, it is not a problem. It really does not need much
efforts to stir
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned. My comments are
mainly additive.
On Sep 26, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
First, let me say, despite the casual, inaccurate, and one data
point nature of the method shown, it is far
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned.
They are indeed.
I think running the steam and water through a condensing heat exchanger
works very well, provided *all* the flow and temperature variables are
recorded very frequently - more
2011/9/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, stirring is the problem. You need to stir vigorously with a stick
or
something like a Dremel tool with a paint mixer attached. (Like a giant
eggbeater.)
That is untrue, it is not a
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is nice to see our views so closely aligned.
They are indeed.
I think running the steam and water through a condensing heat
exchanger works very well, provided *all* the flow and temperature
Some corrected thoughts.
For the secondary circuit only one flow meter is needed, and two
thermometers. For the primary circuit, input and output flow meters
should be used, and two thermometers. It is important not to assume
the pump outputs at a constant rate against all pressures into
I wrote: The nice thing about this approach for the 1 MW E-cat is
all that is needed for cooling is a 5 gal/min pump, some big hose,
and a lake or river.
That should have said: The nice thing about this approach for the 1
MW E-cat is all that is needed for cooling is a 200 gal/min pump,
Attached is the scale reading at 0:33 in the Mario video:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
This reading corresponds to the initial 10 kg weight. Note the 5
major divisions. The question then is whether the line at 6 o'clock
is the zero line.
inline: Mario0_33bucket.jpg
Best regards,
Horace
Attached is the scale reading at 2:44 in the Mario video:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
This reading corresponds to the final weight. Note the 6 major
divisions. 12 minor divisions. The question then is whether the line
at 6 o'clock is the zero line.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
Attached is a jpeg, Krivit9_53.jpg, from 9.53 in the Krivit video.
showing Rossi's wrist and the steam pipe.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
inline: Krivit9_53.jpg
12 matches
Mail list logo
