On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Horace wrote: «Sparging steam into a bucket, though far better that
other steam methods applied to date on Rossi's devices, and
publicly disclosed, has numerous serious drawbacks, which have
already been discussed.»
And where they are d
So, you believe the issue is settled by the use of flow calorimetry (hopefully
you mean without phase change).
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Percolator Effect
Joe Catania
Thank you Horace, I think you really have driven the final nails into
the Rossi coffin, with your exemplary analysis of the percolator
effect, along with cogent remarks about the endless wan discussions.
within mutual service, Rich Murray
Horace Heffner wrote:
> Hold on there! I assume you refer to the discussions and churning here, in
> this group.
>
>
> You assume wrongly. I refer in addition to Rossi's blog, the CMNS news
> list, Krivit's blog, public press, etc., etc.
>
Ah, well these other forums are also populated by peop
Joe Catania wrote:
I'm suggesting what I believe many others have. What should be
eliminated is complications like anything flowing, anything shanging
phase, heat leakage.
Phase changes are a problem, although ice calorimetry has been around
for a long time.
The only kind of calorimetry th
On Aug 25, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
The correct thing to do is to do calorimetry on the output using a
well calibrated professionally designed calorimeter independent of
the device itself . . .
Defkalion claims they have done this.
Alarm bells should
tions there should be a
conclusion possible.
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Percolator Effect
Joe Catania wrote:
One should stay away from E-Cat calorimetry and instead pe
Joe Catania wrote:
**
> One should stay away from E-Cat calorimetry and instead perform calorimetry
> on the actual nickel-hydrogen reaction.
>
What is the difference? An eCat is a reactor vessel, and so is a Defkalion
reactor. You can only perform calorimetry on a vessel of some sort.
Are you
One should stay away from E-Cat calorimetry and instead perform calorimetry on
the actual nickel-hydrogen reaction.
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Percolator Effect
Horace
Horace Heffner wrote:
> The correct thing to do is to do calorimetry on the output using a well
> calibrated professionally designed calorimeter independent of the device
> itself . . .
>
Defkalion claims they have done this.
Alarm bells should go off in your head when you see the amount of d
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Horace wrote: «Sparging steam into a bucket, though far better that
other steam methods applied to date on Rossi's devices, and
publicly disclosed, has numerous serious drawbacks, which have
already been discussed.»
And where they are d
The computations in the following pdfs are provided in order to
hopefully permit more meaningful discussion or understanding of the
percolator effect as it relates to Rossi type devices and simulators:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/KrivitFilm.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Cantw
Horace wrote: «Sparging steam into a bucket, though far better that other
steam methods applied to date on Rossi's devices, and publicly disclosed,
has numerous serious drawbacks, which have already been discussed.»
And where they are discussed and by whom? There might be problems, and first
is th
The computations in the following pdfs are provided in order to
hopefully permit more meaningful discussion or understanding of the
percolator effect as it relates to Rossi type devices and simulators:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/KrivitFilm.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Cantw
14 matches
Mail list logo
