Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

Entanglement is an inevitable feature of reality

In a new study, physicists have mathematically proved that any theory
<https://phys.org/tags/theory/> that has a classical limit—meaning that it
can describe our observations of the classical world
<https://phys.org/tags/classical+world/> by recovering classical theory
under certain conditions—must contain entanglement. So despite the fact
that entanglement goes against classical intuition, entanglement must be an
inevitable feature of not only quantum theory but also any non-classical
theory, even those that are yet to be developed.

Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2017-09-entanglement-inevitable-feature-reality.html#jCp

Much of the way that LENR works is based on entanglement.


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Monogamy of entanglement
>
> '''Monogamy ''' is one of the most fundamental properties of entanglement
> and can, in its extremal form, be expressed as follows: *If two qubits A
> and B are maximally quantumly correlated they cannot be correlated at all
> with a third qubit C.* In general, there is a trade-off between the
> amount of entanglement between qubits A and B and the same qubit A and
> qubit C. This is mathematically expressed by the *Coffman-Kundu-Wootters
> (CKW) monogamy inequality*
>
>
> *In other words, to create entanglement during particle creation as a
> unbreakable rule of the way the universe works, two particles are required.*
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In a universe where all points must be connected, a pair is a topological
>> requirement. In a system where all endpoints must be connected then every
>> connection must have at least two endpoints.
>>
>> At the beginning of the big bang, Computational complexity was at its
>> minimum and quantum entanglement was at its maximum. The entire universe
>> was completely entangled, it was a bose condensate. This was the time when
>> all the forces were combined in a grand unification to operated as a single
>> force. As the universe expanded and cooled, entanglement decreased and
>> Computational complexity increased. The four fundamental forces began to
>> diverge and the running coupling constants of those fundamental forces also
>> began to diverge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When spacetime returns to the entangled state that the universe was
>> initially in, the fundamental forces return to the way that they were at
>> the beginning of the big bang and the single global fundamental force is
>> reestablished.
>>
>>
>> In this restored state of spacetime simplicity, the LENR reaction is
>> manifest.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:38 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That doesn’t answer my question… it’s just regurgitating the
>>> particle/antiparticle jargon.
>>>
>>> -mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41 AM
>>> *To:* vortex-l
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
>>> Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
>>> entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
>>> entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
>>> antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
>>> must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
>>> wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by
>>> using entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
>>> entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
>>>
>>> Leonard Susskind
>>> <https://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Susskind_L/0/1/0/all/0/1>
>>>
>>> *(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, here is how wormholes work
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&

Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

Monogamy of entanglement

'''Monogamy ''' is one of the most fundamental properties of entanglement
and can, in its extremal form, be expressed as follows: *If two qubits A
and B are maximally quantumly correlated they cannot be correlated at all
with a third qubit C.* In general, there is a trade-off between the amount
of entanglement between qubits A and B and the same qubit A and qubit C.
This is mathematically expressed by the *Coffman-Kundu-Wootters (CKW)
monogamy inequality*


*In other words, to create entanglement during particle creation as a
unbreakable rule of the way the universe works, two particles are required.*

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In a universe where all points must be connected, a pair is a topological
> requirement. In a system where all endpoints must be connected then every
> connection must have at least two endpoints.
>
> At the beginning of the big bang, Computational complexity was at its
> minimum and quantum entanglement was at its maximum. The entire universe
> was completely entangled, it was a bose condensate. This was the time when
> all the forces were combined in a grand unification to operated as a single
> force. As the universe expanded and cooled, entanglement decreased and
> Computational complexity increased. The four fundamental forces began to
> diverge and the running coupling constants of those fundamental forces also
> began to diverge.
>
>
>
>
> When spacetime returns to the entangled state that the universe was
> initially in, the fundamental forces return to the way that they were at
> the beginning of the big bang and the single global fundamental force is
> reestablished.
>
>
> In this restored state of spacetime simplicity, the LENR reaction is
> manifest.
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:38 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>> That doesn’t answer my question… it’s just regurgitating the
>> particle/antiparticle jargon.
>>
>> -mark
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?
>>
>>
>>
>> The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
>> Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
>> entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
>> entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
>> antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
>> must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
>> wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.
>>
>>
>>
>> We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by
>> using entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
>> entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.
>>
>>
>>
>> This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:
>>
>>
>> Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
>>
>> Leonard Susskind
>> <https://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Susskind_L/0/1/0/all/0/1>
>>
>> *(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)*
>>
>>
>>
>> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, here is how wormholes work
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Vorts,
>>
>>
>>
>> Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-
>> universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god
>>
>>
>>
>> Some excerpts:
>>
>> The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the
>> Conservation of Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed –
>> showing that new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.
>>
>>
>>
>> These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles
>> simply pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
>> Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
>> describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
>> universe simply doesn’t like a state of nothingness.
>>
>>
>>
>> -mark iverson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

In a universe where all points must be connected, a pair is a topological
requirement. In a system where all endpoints must be connected then every
connection must have at least two endpoints.

At the beginning of the big bang, Computational complexity was at its
minimum and quantum entanglement was at its maximum. The entire universe
was completely entangled, it was a bose condensate. This was the time when
all the forces were combined in a grand unification to operated as a single
force. As the universe expanded and cooled, entanglement decreased and
Computational complexity increased. The four fundamental forces began to
diverge and the running coupling constants of those fundamental forces also
began to diverge.




When spacetime returns to the entangled state that the universe was
initially in, the fundamental forces return to the way that they were at
the beginning of the big bang and the single global fundamental force is
reestablished.


In this restored state of spacetime simplicity, the LENR reaction is
manifest.

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:38 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
wrote:

> That doesn’t answer my question… it’s just regurgitating the
> particle/antiparticle jargon.
>
> -mark
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?
>
>
>
> The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
> Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
> entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
> entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
> antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
> must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
> wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.
>
>
>
> We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by
> using entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
> entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.
>
>
>
> This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:
>
>
> Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
>
> Leonard Susskind
> <https://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Susskind_L/0/1/0/all/0/1>
>
> *(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)*
>
>
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040
>
>
>
> Also, here is how wormholes work
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
> Vorts,
>
>
>
> Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:
>
>
>
> http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-
> universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god
>
>
>
> Some excerpts:
>
> The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the
> Conservation of Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed –
> showing that new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.
>
>
>
> These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles
> simply pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.
>
>
>
> Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
> Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
> describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
> universe simply doesn’t like a state of nothingness.
>
>
>
> -mark iverson
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

That doesn’t answer my question… it’s just regurgitating the 
particle/antiparticle jargon.

-mark

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

 

The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together. Entanglement 
is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from entanglement. In 
order for entanglement to exist, two things must be entangled. When a particle 
is created, it must be paired with an antiparticle so that a connection between 
them is formed...entanglement must be created.  All particle pairs must be 
connected by a wormhole. The wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime 
together. 

 

We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by using 
entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge) 
entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.

 

This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here: 

 


Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM


Leonard Susskind <https://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Susskind_L/0/1/0/all/0/1> 

(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)

 

https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040

 

Also, here is how wormholes work

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8

 

 

 

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:

Vorts,

 

Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god

 

Some excerpts:

The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the Conservation of 
Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed – showing that new 
energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.

 

These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles simply 
pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.

 

Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 
who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that describes how quarks 
behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the universe simply doesn’t 
like a state of nothingness.

 

-mark iverson

 

 

Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.

We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by using
entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.

This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:

Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
Leonard Susskind

(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040

Also, here is how wormholes work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8



On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint 
wrote:

> Vorts,
>
>
>
> Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:
>
>
>
> http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-
> universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god
>
>
>
> Some excerpts:
>
> The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the
> Conservation of Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed –
> showing that new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.
>
>
>
> These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles
> simply pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.
>
>
>
> Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
> Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
> describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
> universe simply doesn’t like a state of nothingness.
>
>
>
> -mark iverson
>
>
>

[Vo]:Why pairs?

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

Vorts,

 

Perusing some physics news, and thought you'd b interested in this:

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-universe-quarks-
quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god

 

Some excerpts:



The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the Conservation
of Energy - that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - showing that
new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.

 

These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles simply
pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.

 

Nobel prize winner Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, who specialises is quantum chromodynamics, the theory that
describes how quarks behave deep within atomic nuclei, has found that the
universe simply doesn't like a state of nothingness.

 

-mark iverson