I thought Frolov was long gone (may have confused him with S. Marinov.)
Like Naudin, he had MEG test reports, plus LOTS of other Russian crackpot
stuff which we in the USA have never encountered ...but it was all paper
publications. Testing of time machines. Poliakov antigravity. Kilowatt
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Veeder
>
> I suspect there is something important missing from this account.
> What prompted Moller to look at Langmuir's work in the firstplace?
>
>
> The impetus was that Moller, who is Dan
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
I suspect there is something important missing from this account.
What prompted Moller to look at Langmuir's work in the firstplace?
The impetus was that Moller, who is Danish, found and read private letters
from Bohr (the great Dane) to
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
>>
>> Jones
>
>
> I see that Sterling Allen's page on the MHG project by Naudin never
> benefited from an explanation of the in
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
Jones
I see that Sterling Allen's page on the MHG project by Naudin never
benefited from an explanation of the input power error. It's got some
enthusiastic posts from you. Maybe you'd lik
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
There are other Naudin sites which suffer the same problem.
An inability to admit personal error is fatal for anyone involved
with scientific investigation. A real scientist, discovering a
significant error in published work, will *immediately* annou
At 09:50 AM 12/16/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
Very silly error by Naudin (discovered up by George Holz on the MAGH forum)
in that JLN was using a 5% duty cycle and "calculated" the gain by reducing
the input readings - instead of measuring them directly.
Naudin's error was a multiple of 20 (recipro
Another has written about problems with the
Naudin "replication." I haven't checked that out,
but, yes, if you believe everything you read on
the Internet, and don't check it, your mind can
be "blown." Rather easily, since it's held
together with chewing gum and a bit of duct tape.
Seriously
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:13 AM, David ledin
wrote:
> this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
> Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery.
Although your premise regarding JLN has been explained here as Jones said:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/aH-gen/
you
Original Message-
From: David ledin
wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery JL Naudin replicator
achieved COP of 21 with this device (power input of
One hour tests with a COP of 21
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/tests/mahg2c.htm
Full tests
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/mahg/tests/index.htm
On 12/16/12, David ledin wrote:
> wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
>
> this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic
wow today i find a website that was totally mind blowing.
this website is about replication Nicholas Moller 's Atomic Hydrogen
Generator based on Irving Langmuir discovery. (nobel prize winner in
chemistry 1932) replicator don't called this cold fusion or lenr
device but you can see this device i
There's an excellent and large collection of physics essay entries
over at the 2012 FQXi essay contest. (Rats! Entries are closed, finalists
already selected!)
Contest, which of our basic physical assumptions are wrong?
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1263
the essays
http://fqxi.o
The mod software on the site doesn't appear to be quite that simple minded.
Dunno. Sorry for the noise.
Jeff
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> I just attempted to post a comment to a well-known "cold fusion" web site
> that appears, on the surface, to be doing independent
I just attempted to post a comment to a well-known "cold fusion" web site
that appears, on the surface, to be doing independent reporting. In the
comment, I mentioned a competitor of A. Rossi (the competitor I mentioned:
Brillouin).
The comment was subject to "automatic moderation".
Curious, I th
15 matches
Mail list logo
