Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-05 Thread Standing Bear
On Saturday 04 February 2006 22:30, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Steven Krivit wrote: My sources...atomic energy researchers in France and Canada say we have 80 years of uranium left. I don't know where the peak is. That agrees with what I believe I've read elsewhere. HOWEVER... ... That's

Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-04 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Steven Krivit wrote: My sources...atomic energy researchers in France and Canada say we have 80 years of uranium left. I don't know where the peak is. That agrees with what I believe I've read elsewhere. HOWEVER... ... That's just U235, and unless I miss my guess, it's without

Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Zell, Chris
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years. Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite overwhelming political evidence that it is real), the clear answer is THAT URANIUM HAS PEAKED! The same goes for the rich Cape Cod elitists who don't want wind turbines off

Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Jed Rothwell
Zell, Chris wrote: We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years. Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite overwhelming political evidence that it is real) Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not citizens. Citizens do not like them

Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Jed Rothwell
At 10:24 AM 2/3/2006, you wrote: Zell, Chris wrote: We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years. Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite overwhelming political evidence that it is real) Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies,

RE: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Zell, Chris
-Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:38 AM To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Subject: Re: Do we have peak uranium, too? At 10:24 AM 2/3/2006, you wrote: Zell, Chris wrote: We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built

RE: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Zell, Chris
, 2006 11:54 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: Do we have peak uranium, too? Zell, Chris wrote: We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years. Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected You are misconstruing a lot of things here. Peak oil was predicted quite a long

Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread Harry Veeder
Jed Rothwell wrote: Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not citizens. The expectation of a continually rising demand for electricity made investment in nuclear power plants back in the '60s and '70s a good idea. When the demand for electricity unexpectedly levelled

Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?

2006-02-03 Thread hohlrauml6d
-Original Message- From: Harry Veeder Jed Rothwell wrote: Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not citizens. The expectation of a continually rising demand for electricity made investment in nuclear power plants back in the '60s and '70s a good idea. When