On Saturday 04 February 2006 22:30, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
My sources...atomic energy researchers in France and Canada say we have
80 years of uranium left. I don't know where the peak is.
That agrees with what I believe I've read elsewhere. HOWEVER...
... That's
Steven Krivit wrote:
My sources...atomic energy researchers in France and Canada say we have
80 years of uranium left. I don't know where the peak is.
That agrees with what I believe I've read elsewhere. HOWEVER...
... That's just U235, and unless I miss my guess, it's without
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years.
Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite overwhelming
political
evidence that it is real), the clear answer is THAT URANIUM HAS PEAKED!
The same goes for the rich Cape Cod elitists who don't want wind
turbines
off
Zell, Chris wrote:
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years.
Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite
overwhelming political evidence that it is real)
Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not
citizens. Citizens do not like them
At 10:24 AM 2/3/2006, you wrote:
Zell, Chris wrote:
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years.
Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected ( despite
overwhelming political evidence that it is real)
Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies,
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:38 AM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?
At 10:24 AM 2/3/2006, you wrote:
Zell, Chris wrote:
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built
, 2006 11:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Do we have peak uranium, too?
Zell, Chris wrote:
We haven't had any new nuclear power plants built in many years.
Since any notion of NIMBYism is to be rejected
You are misconstruing a lot of things here.
Peak oil was predicted quite a long
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not
citizens.
The expectation of a continually rising demand for electricity made
investment in nuclear power plants back in the '60s and '70s a good idea.
When the demand for electricity unexpectedly levelled
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Nuclear power plants have been rejected by power companies, not
citizens.
The expectation of a continually rising demand for electricity made
investment in nuclear power plants back in the '60s and '70s a good
idea.
When
9 matches
Mail list logo